Outcomes following operative vs. non-operative management of blunt traumatic pancreatic injuries: a retrospective multi-institutional study

Author:

Addison Poppy12,Iurcotta Toni12,Amodu Leo I.12,Crandall Geoffrey1,Akerman Meredith3,Galvin Daniel1,Glazer Annemarie1,Christopherson Nathan1,Prince Jose1,Bank Matthew1,Sorrentino Christopher1,Cagliani Joaquin2,Nicastro Jeffrey12,Coppa Gene12,Molmenti Ernesto P.12,Rilo Horacio L. Rodriguez124

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery Hofstra-Northwell School of Medicine Hempstead NY, USA

2. Pancreas Disease Center Northwell Health Manhasset NY, USA

3. Department of Biostatistics Feinstein Institute for Medical Research Manhasset NY, USA

4. Northwell Health 900 Northern Boulevard, Suite 150 11020 Great Neck NY, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Traumatic pancreatic injuries are rare, and guidelines specifying management are controversial and difficult to apply in the acute clinical setting. Due to sparse data on these injuries, we carried out a retrospective review to determine outcomes following surgical or non-surgical management of traumatic pancreatic injuries. We hypothesize a higher morbidity and mortality rate in patients treated surgically when compared to patients treated non-surgically. Methods We performed a retrospective review of data from four trauma centers in New York from 1990–2014, comparing patients who had blunt traumatic pancreatic injuries who were managed operatively to those managed non-operatively. We compared continuous variables using the Mann-Whitney U test and categorical variables using the chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. Univariate analysis was performed to determine the possible confounding factors associated with mortality in both treatment groups. Results Twenty nine patients were managed operatively and 32 non-operatively. There was a significant difference between the operative and non-operative groups in median age (37.0 vs. 16.2 years, P = 0.016), grade of pancreatic injury (grade I; 30.8 vs. 85.2%, P value for all comparisons <0.0001), median injury severity score (ISS) (16.0 vs. 4.0, P = 0.002), blood transfusion (55.2 vs. 15.6%, P = 0.0012), other abdominal injuries (79.3 vs. 38.7%, P = 0.0014), pelvic fractures (17.2 vs. 0.00%, P = 0.020), intensive care unit (ICU) admission (86.2 vs. 50.0%, P = 0.003), median length of stay (LOS) (16.0 vs. 4.0 days, P <0.0001), and mortality (27.6 vs. 3.1%, P = 0.010). Conclusions Patients with traumatic pancreatic injuries treated operatively were more severely injured and suffered greater complications than those treated non-operatively. The greater morbidity and mortality associated with these patients warrants further study to determine optimal triage strategies and which subset of patients is likely to benefit from surgery.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Dermatology,Biomedical Engineering,Emergency Medicine,Immunology and Allergy,Surgery

Reference24 articles.

1. Rupture of the pancreas;Travers;Lancet,1827

2. Impact of a defined management algorithm on outcome after traumatic pancreatic injury;Sharpe;J Trauma Acute Care Surg,2012

3. Pancreatic trauma: a concise review;Debi;World J Gastroenterol,2013

4. The epidemiology of and outcome from pancreatoduodenal trauma in the UK, 1989–2013;O’Reilly;Ann R Coll Surg Engl,2015

5. Complex pancreatic injuries;Patton;Surgical Clinics,1996

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3