Intralesional injection treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids: a systematic review regarding outcomes

Author:

Trisliana Perdanasari Aurelia1,Torresetti Matteo2,Grassetti Luca2,Nicoli Fabio3,Zhang Yi Xin1,Dashti Talal4,Di Benedetto Giovanni2,Lazzeri Davide4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital Shanghai JiaoTong University, School of Medicine 639 Zhi Zao Ju Road 200011 Shanghai, P.R. China

2. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Marche Polytechnic University Medical School University Hospital of Ancona Ancona, Italy

3. Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery University of Rome Rome, Italy

4. Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Unit Villa Salaria Clinic Rome, Italy

Abstract

Abstract Background The aim of this review was to explore the existing body of literature focusing on the intralesional treatments of keloids and hypertrophic scars. Methods A comprehensive systematic review of related articles was conducted across multiple databases. Article selection was limited to those published in the English language between 1950 and 2014. Search terms for the on-line research were “scar(s),” “keloid(s),” “hypertrophic,” “injection,” “intralesional,” and “treatment”. Results The initial search returned 2548 published articles. After full text review, the final search yielded 11 articles that met inclusion criteria. A total of 14 patient samples in 11 articles were collected. The most frequent intralesional injection treatment studied was triamcinolone (n = 5), followed by bleomycin (n = 3), 5-fluorouracil (n = 2), verapamil (n = 2), cryosurgery, and collagenase. The scar height reduction for all but one study was demonstrated, with acceptable complication and recurrence rate. Only three articles reported a follow-up period longer than 18 months, and only two studies used standardized outcome criteria with a quantitative scale. Conclusions Although many treatment options have already been described in the literature, there is no universally accepted treatment resulting in permanent hypertrophic or keloid scar ablation. The lack of adequately long-term powered randomized controlled trials does not permit to establish definitive conclusions with implications for routine clinical practice. Level of evidence III/Therapeutic

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Dermatology,Biomedical Engineering,Emergency Medicine,Immunology and Allergy,Surgery

Reference69 articles.

1. Scar management: keloid, hypertrophic, atrophic, and acne scars;Tsao;Semin Cutan Med Surg,2002

2. Overview about the keloid scars and the elaboration of a non-invasive, unconventional treatment;Carantino;J Med Life,2010

3. Management of keloids and hypertrophic scars;Juckett;Am Fam Physician,2009

4. Bleomycin tattooing as a promising therapeutic modality in large keloids and hypertrophic scars;Naeini;Dermatol Surg,2006

5. Use of botulinum toxin type A to improve treatment of facial wounds: a prospective randomised study;Ziade;J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg,2013

Cited by 35 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3