Abstract
Abstract
Key message
Populations of the European white elm (Ulmus laevis Pall.) in Switzerland can be considered natural. They show no evidence of genetic differentiation from other European populations. In the past, the U. laevis populations were probably more widespread and continuous in Switzerland with a larger gene flow.
Context
In Switzerland, at the margin of its distribution range, U. laevis is rare and considered endangered. Whether the species is native to Switzerland has been disputed, and it is often surmised to be solely cultivated, without any natural population in the country.
Aims
The structure of genetic diversity among Swiss populations of U. laevis and comparison to European populations are expected to shed light on the origin of local populations and support their management.
Methods
We analyzed 19 populations (194 individuals) in Switzerland and 15 populations (158 individuals) from other European countries, using a set of five microsatellite loci.
Results
(1) 90% of the genetic variation in European and Swiss populations occurs within populations. (2) We did not detect isolation by distance at the regional or continental scale. (3) Clustering analysis did not reveal any spatial pattern in the level of admixture of individuals within Swiss or other European populations.
Conclusion
Moderate levels of genetic diversity and evidence for recent gene flow between populations indicate that habitat deterioration, loss, and fragmentation are the main threats to the persistence of U. laevis populations in Switzerland.
Funder
Natural History Museum Fribourg
Fondation Franklinia
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference52 articles.
1. Aas G (2019) Die Flatterulme (Ulmus laevis): Verwandtschaft, Morphologie und Ökologie. LWF Wissen 7–12
2. Adamack AT, Gruber B (2014) PopGenReport: simplifying basic population genetic analyses in R. Methods Ecol Evol 5:384–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12158
3. Bonin A, Bellemain E, Bronken Eidesen P et al (2004) How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies. Mol Ecol 13:3261–3273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2004.02346.x
4. Bourge M, Brown SC, Siljak-Yakovlev S (2018) Flow cytometry as tool in plant sciences, with emphasis on genome size and ploidy level assessment. G&A 2:1–12. https://doi.org/10.31383/ga.vol2iss2pp1-12
5. Caudullo G, De Rigo D (2016) Ulmus-elms in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. European atlas of forest tree species 186–188