Author:
Nause Nelia,Ispizua Yamati Facundo R.,Seidel Marion,Mahlein Anne-Katrin,Hoffmann Christa M.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Cell characteristics, including cell type, size, shape, packing, cell-to-cell-adhesion, intercellular space, and cell wall thickness, influence the physical characteristics of plant tissues. Genotypic differences were found concerning damage susceptibility related to beet texture for sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Sugar beet storage roots are characterized by heterogeneous tissue with several cambium rings surrounded by small-celled vascular tissue and big-celled sugar-storing parenchyma between the rings. This study presents a procedure for phenotyping heterogeneous tissues like beetroots by imaging.
Results
Ten Beta genotypes (nine sugar beet and one fodder beet) were included to establish a pipeline for the automated histologic evaluation of cell characteristics and tissue arrangement using digital image processing written in the programming language R. The identification of cells has been validated by comparison with manual cell identification. Cells are reliably discriminated from intercellular spaces, and cells with similar morphological features are assigned to biological tissue types.
Conclusions
Genotypic differences in cell diameter and cell arrangement can straightforwardly be phenotyped by the presented workflow. The presented routine can further identify genotypic differences in cell diameter and cell arrangement during early growth stages and between sugar storage capabilities.
Funder
SESVanderHave
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Plant Science,Genetics,Biotechnology
Reference39 articles.
1. Eliceiri KW, Berthold MR, Goldberg IG, Ibáñez L, Manjunath BS, Martone ME, et al. Biological imaging software tools. Nat Methods. 2012;9:697–710. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2084.
2. Hall HC, Fakhrzadeh A, Luengo Hendriks CL, Fischer U. Precision automation of cell type classification and sub-cellular fluorescence quantification from laser scanning confocal images. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:119. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00119.
3. Artschwager E. Anatomy of the vegetative organs of the sugar beet. Washington: US Government Printing Office; 1926.
4. Buchholz K, Tarrach R, Bliesener K-M. Chemische Aspekte der mechanischen Schnitzelentwässerung. Zuckerind. 1986;111:23–37.
5. Gemtos TA. Sugar beet root properties in relation to harvesting damage. Int Comm Agric Eng. 1999;1.https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/10198
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献