Abstract
Abstract
Background
Forest canopies are highly sensitive to their growth, health, and climate change. The study aims to obtain time sequence images in mix foresters using a near-earth remote sensing method to track the seasonal variation in the color index and select the optimal color index. Three different regions of interest (RIOs) were defined and six color indexes (GRVI, HUE, GGR, RCC, GCC, and GEI) were calculated to analyze the microenvironment difference. The key phenological phase was identified using the double logistic model and the derivative method, and the phenology forecast of color indexes was performed based on the long short-term memory (LSTM) model.
Results
The results showed that the same color index in different RIOs and different color indexes in the same RIO present a slight difference in the days of growth and the days corresponding to the peak value, exhibiting different phenological phases; the mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of the LSTM model was 0.0016, 0.0405, 0.0334, and 12.55%, respectively, indicating that this model has a good forecast effect.
Conclusions
In different areas of the same forest, differences in the micro-ecological environment in the canopies were prevalent, with their internal growth mechanism being affected by different cultivation ways and the external environment. Besides, the optimal color index also varies with species in phenological response, that is, different color indexes are used for different forests. With the data of color indexes as the training set and forecast set, the feasibility of the LSTM model in phenology forecast is verified.
Funder
Beijing Common Construction Project and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Plant Science,Genetics,Biotechnology
Reference46 articles.
1. Kvitko M, Savosko V, Kozlovskaya I, Lykholat Y, Podolyak A, Hrygoruk I, et al. Woody artificial plantations as a significant factor of the sustainable development at mining & metallurgical area. In: E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 280). EDP Sciences; 2021. p. 06005. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128006005.
2. Biber P, Nordström EM, Nieuwenhuis M. Ecosystem services and forest management in Europe: Perspectives from the EU Project ALTERFOR. In: The 69th Tagung des Deutschen Forstvereins, Dresden, Ireland; 8–12 May 2019. p. 1–18.
3. Sotirov M, Arts B. Integrated forest governance in Europe: An introduction to the special issue on forest policy integration and integrated forest management. Land Use Policy. 2018;79:960–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.042.
4. Hidayat H. USA: Sustainable forest management. In: Sustainable Plantation Forestry. Springer, Singapore; 2018. p. 251–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7653-4_8.
5. Stocker LB, Robie K, Godbee JF Jr, Shepard J. Southern forest resource assessment: Responses. J For. 2002;100(7):51.