Author:
Sbodio Adrian O.,Mesquida-Pesci Saskia D.,Yip Nancy,Alvarez-Rojo Isabela,Gutierrez-Baeza Elia,Tay Samantha,Bello Pedro,Wang Luxin,Blanco-Ulate Barbara
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Fungal pathogens significantly impact the quality of fruits and vegetables at different stages of the supply chain, leading to substantial food losses. Understanding how these persistent fungal infections occur and progress in postharvest conditions is essential to developing effective control strategies.
Results
In this study, we developed a reliable and consistent inoculation protocol to simulate disease spread from infected fruits to adjacent healthy fruits during postharvest storage. We tested different combinations of relevant fruit commodities, including oranges, tomatoes, and apples, against impactful postharvest pathogens such as Penicillium digitatum, Penicillium italicum, Botrytis cinerea, and Penicillium expansum. We assessed the efficacy of this protocol using fruits treated with various postharvest methods and multiple isolates for each pathogen. We optimized the source of infected tissue and incubation conditions for each fruit-pathogen combination. Disease incidence and severity were quantitatively evaluated to study infection success and progression. At the final evaluation point, 80% or higher disease incidence rates were observed in all trials except for the fungicide-treated oranges inoculated with fungicide-susceptible Penicillium spp. isolates. Although disease incidence was lower in that particular scenario, it is noteworthy that the pathogen was still able to establish itself under unfavorable conditions, indicating the robustness of our methodology. Finally, we used multispectral imaging to detect early P. digitatum infections in oranges before the disease became visible to the naked eye but after the pathogen was established.
Conclusions
We developed a non-invasive inoculation strategy that can be used to recreate infections caused by contact or nesting in postharvest. The observed high disease incidence and severity values across fruit commodities and fungal pathogens demonstrate the robustness, efficacy, and reproducibility of the developed methodology. The protocol has the potential to be tailored for other pathosystems. Additionally, this approach can facilitate the study of fruit-pathogen interactions and the assessment of innovative control strategies.
Funder
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
‘la Caixa’ Foundation
Department of Plant Sciences, UC Davis, James Monroe McDonald Endowment, administered by UCANR
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Gustavsson J, Cederberg C, Sonesson U. Global food losses and food waste: extent, causes and prevention; study conducted for the International Congress Save Food! At Interpack 2011, [16–17 May], Düsseldorf, Germany. 2011th ed. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2011.
2. Zhang S, Zheng Q, Xu B, Liu J. Identification of the fungal pathogens of Postharvest Disease on Peach fruits and the control mechanisms of Bacillus subtilis JK-14. Toxins. 2019;11:322.
3. Nabi SU, Raja WH, Kumawat KL, Mir JI, Sharma OC, Singh DB, et al. Post Harvest diseases of Temperate fruits and their management Strategies-A review. Int J Pure Appl Biosci. 2017;5:885–98.
4. Adaskaveg JE, Förster H, Prusky DB. Chapter 1: overview of Postharvest Pathology [Internet]. Postharvest Pathology of Fruit and Nut crops. The American Phytopathological Society; 2022. pp. 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1094/9780890546680.001.
5. Wielkopolan B, Jakubowska M, Obrępalska-Stęplowska A. Beetles as Plant Pathogen Vectors. Front. Plant Sci. 2021;12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.748093.