Access block and overcrowding at the emergency department at Tupua Tamasese Meaole Hospital in Samoa

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAccess block and overcrowding are known to adversely impact on patient outcomes, service delivery, and patient experiences within emergency departments (ED) worldwide. There are no studies on access block or overcrowding from the Pacific Islands. The aim of the present study is to provide preliminary data on access block and overcrowding in the ED of the national tertiary hospital of Samoa.MethodsMixed methods study design. Data collection was performed in March 2020. The quantitative strand calculated (1) the point prevalence of patients impacted by access block in the ED, and (2) the ED bed occupancy rate to assess for overcrowding. The qualitative strand used thematic analysis of two focus group interviews exploring access block and overcrowding with ED medical and nursing staff members.ResultsOn the day of data collection, a total of 60 patients presented through the ED triage system. Of the 20 patients who were admitted into ED, 80% were triaged as ‘see without delay’ (CAT1), ‘emergency’ (CAT2) or ‘urgent’ (CAT3). For patients requiring admission to hospital wards, 100% waited 4 + h in ED, and 100% waited 8 + h, suggesting the presence of access block. Overcrowding in the ED setting was also evident, with an ED bed occupancy rate of 0.95, and an adjusted bed occupancy rate of 1.43. The major themes emerging from the ED staff focus groups and individual in-depth interviews were (1) the adverse impacts of access block and overcrowding, i.e., violence towards ED staff members, (2) the preventable contributing factors, i.e., lack of physical beds in the ED, and (3) practical recommendations to improve patient flow through the ED, i.e., improved collaboration between ED, outpatient services, and the hospital wards.ConclusionsPreliminary evidence suggested the presence of access block and overcrowding in the ED of the national tertiary hospital of Samoa. ED staff interviews provided insight into the ED frontline challenges and offered practical recommendations for ED health service improvement.