Author:
Guptill Mindi,Reibling Ellen,Phan Tammy,Khoo Bryant,Lin Stephen,Donham Corbin,Wang Cheryl,Walters E. Lea
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This study examined the conflicts between different generations working in US emergency departments (ED). We sought to record generational differences involving communication preferences, perceived areas of conflict, work motivations, and attitudes regarding work-life balance.
Methods
We developed a survey to assess the physician perspective on generational conflict in the ED. The survey was distributed to members of the American College of Emergency Physicians, a professional organization comprising emergency medicine physicians in the USA.
Results
We received 696 completed responses. Men represented 60% of respondents and the largest proportion of respondents were emergency physicians working in community settings (53%); 11% were residents. Generation representation was smallest for Traditionalist (2%) and largest for Gen X (43%). Seventy percent reported observing conflict due to generational communication with the largest frequency being once a week (26%). In the associated open-ended questions, 247 (33%) provided 316 anecdotal descriptions of observed conflict. Responses clustered into seven themes (ordered by frequency): Work Ethic, Treatment Approach, Technology Application, Entitlement, Professionalism, Work Life/Balance, and Communication Style. Comparing Work Ethic responses, 52–70-year-olds reported that younger providers are less interested in “accomplishing anything” while 26–34-year-olds resented that attitude. Respondents completing the open-ended questions regarding preventing and responding to conflict provided some insight into helpful strategies including actions supportive of clear communication and standardized policies and expectations. Only 5% of respondents reported that they had discussed generational communication in department meetings with the odds of a woman reporting conflict being less than males (p = .01).
Conclusion
Conflicts in the ED in the USA can be attributed to how an individual views the values of someone from another generation. Understanding the frequency and areas of generational conflict in the ED can help medical leaders find strategies to mitigate negative workplace interactions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Moreno-Walton L, Brunett P, Akhtar S, DeBlieux PM. Teaching across the generation gap: a consensus from the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors 2009 academic assembly. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16(Suppl 2):S19-24.
2. Howell LP, Joad JP, Callahan E, Servis G, Bonham AC. Generational forecasting in academic medicine: a unique method of planning for success in the next two decades. Acad Med. 2009;84(8):985–93.
3. Mohr NM, Moreno-Walton L, Mills AM, Brunett PH, Promes SB; Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Aging and Generational Issues in Academic Emergency Medicine Task Force. Generational influences in academic emergency medicine: teaching and learning, mentoring, and technology (part I). Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(2):190–9.
4. Erickson T. (2011). Generations around the globe. Harvard Business Review. Online https://hbr.org/2011/04/generations-around-the-globe-1.
5. Boysen PG 2nd, Daste L, Northern T. Multigenerational challenges and the future of graduate medical education. Ochsner J. 2016;16(1):101–7.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献