Do-not-attempt-resuscitation decision making: physicians’ recommendations differ from the GO-FAR score predictions

Author:

Alao David Olukolade,Abraham Snaha,Dababneh Emad,Roby Roxanne,Farid Mohammed,Mohammed Nada,Rojas-Perilla Natalia,Cevik Arif Alper

Abstract

Abstract Background and aim In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is a major cause of mortality globally, and over 50% of the survivors will require institutional care as a result of poor neurological outcome. It is important that physicians discuss the likely outcome of resuscitation with patients and families during end-of-life discussions to help them with decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We aim to compare three consultants’ do-not-resuscitate (DNR) decisions with the GO-FAR score predictions of the probability of survival with good neurological outcomes following in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). Methods This is a retrospective study of all patients 18 years or older placed on a DNR order by a consensus of three consultants in a tertiary institution in the United Arab Emirates over 12 months. Patients’ socio-demographics and the GO-FAR variables were abstracted from the electronic medical records. We applied the GO-FAR score and the probability of survival with good neurological outcomes for each patient. Results A total of 788 patients received a DNR order, with a median age of 71 years and a majority being males and expatriates. The GO-FAR model categorized 441 (56%) of the patients as having a low or very low probability of survival and 347 (44%) as average or above. There were 219 patients with a primary diagnosis of cancer, of whom 148 (67.6%) were in the average and above-average probability groups. There were more In-hospital deaths among patients in the average and above-average probability of survival group compared with those with very low and low probability (243 (70%) versus 249 (56.5%) (P < 0.0001)). The DNR patients with an average or above average chance of survival by GO-FAR score were more likely to be expatriates, oncology patients, and did not have sepsis. Conclusions The GO-FAR score provides a guide for joint decision-making on the possible outcomes of CPR in the event of IHCA. The physicians’ recommendation and the ultimate patient’s resuscitation choice may differ due to more complex contextual medico-social factors.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference23 articles.

1. Holmberg MJ, Ross C, Chan PS, Duval-Arnould J, Grossestreuer AV, Yankama T, et al. Incidence of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States. Circulation. 2018;138(Suppl2):A23–A.

2. Geri G, Scales DC, Koh M, Wijeysundera HC, Lin S, Feldman M, Cheskes S, Dorian P, Isaranuwatchai W, Morrison LJ, Ko DT. Healthcare costs and resource utilization associated with treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2020;153:234–242. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.04.032. Epub 2020 the 15th of May. PMID: 32422247.

3. Qvist Kristensen L, van Tulder MW, Eiskjær H, Sørensen L, Wulff Risør B, Gregersen Oestergaard L. Cost of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors compared with matched control groups. Resuscitation. 2024;199:110239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110239. Epub 2024 May 13. PMID: 38750785.

4. Ngunga N, Yonga LM, Wachira G, Ezekowitz B. JA. Initial Rhythm and Resuscitation Outcomes for Patients Developing Cardiac Arrest in Hospital: Data From Low-Middle Income Country. Glob Heart. 2018;13(4):255–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gheart.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 the 18th of August. PMID: 30131253.

5. Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Delling FN, Deo R, de Ferranti SD, Ferguson JF, Fornage M, Gillespie C, Isasi CR, Jiménez MC, Jordan LC, Judd SE, Lackland D, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth L, Liu S, Longenecker CT, Lutsey PL, Mackey JS, Matchar DB, Matsushita K, Mussolino ME, Nasir K, O’Flaherty M, Palaniappan LP, Pandey A, Pandey DK, Reeves MJ, Ritchey MD, Rodriguez CJ, Roth GA, Rosamond WD, Sampson UKA, Satou GM, Shah SH, Spartano NL, Tirschwell DL, Tsao CW, Voeks JH, Willey JZ, Wilkins JT, Wu JH, Alger HM, Wong SS, Muntner P, American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2018 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137(12):e67-e492. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000558. Epub 2018 the 31st of January. Erratum in: Circulation. 2018;137(12):e493. PMID: 29386200.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3