Abstract
AbstractSince China entered the Xi Jinping Era, the CPC has formally put forward a series of significant theories on China’s future development path, including Xi Jinping Thought on Culture. These theories have sparked active discussions and responses within both domestic and international academic and theoretical circles. This paper argues that when analyzing the major relationships between Chinese civilization and other civilizations worldwide, the Chinese path to modernization and the modern civilization of the Chinese Nation, and Chinese culture and its constituent ethnic cultures, we should further elucidate relationships and adhere to the three foundational principles: subjectivity, the contemporaneity of Chinese culture, and the arterial and leading attributes of Chinese culture, which encapsulate the core issues in fostering the modern civilization of Chinese Nation. A proper understanding and nuanced handling of these issues not only bolsters the perpetuation and evolution of China’s excellent traditional culture but also propels the trajectory of the Chinese path to modernization and the overarching construction of the modern civilization of Chinese Nation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference15 articles.
1. Fei, Xiaotong. 1999. 费孝通文集, 第14卷 (Collected works of Fei Xiaotong, vol. 14, 407–408. Beijing: Qunyan Press.
2. Guidebook for the report to the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China. 2022. In Chinese:党的二十大报告辅导读本. 401–403. Beijing: People’s Publishing House.
3. He, Xingliang. 2023.中华民族共同体的文化象征:基于习近平关于“石榴籽”和“石榴”相关论述的阐释(The cultural symbol of community for the Chinese Nation: explanation based upon Xi Jinping’s discourse related on “Pomegranate Seeds” and “Pomegranate”). Ethno-National Studies (01): 1–11+ 142.
4. Hofstede, Geert. 1988. The confucius connection: from cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics 16 (4): 5–21.
5. Inglehart, Ronald, and Wayne E. Baker. 2000. Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review 65: 19.