Abstract
AbstractThis paper investigates how different institutions of Loba communities of the Upper Mustang work together and facilitate the community to cope with the environmental dynamics in the region. The indigenous institutions are place-based, and their evolution is concerned with reducing vulnerability and enhancing the resilience capacity of place-based communities to cope with and adapt to local natural and socio-cultural environmental dynamics. The paper is based on anthropological fieldwork. Qualitative data were collected by applying observation and interviews. The paper presents the role of the galbo, (Lo King), ghenba (Village Chief), Lama (Monk), and dhongba (Household) as local institutions that act in close relation and make community-level decisions. The findings reveal that the King is seen as the leader whose governance best suited to the local natural environment, cultural practices, and economy. The Lama plays a major role in reinforcing local rules, while the Ghenba is an agent who mediates the Lo King and people in materializing rules and operationalizing institutional mechanisms. The Dhongbas are units of production of the local social-ecosystem that are entitled to use local resources within the context of the institution’s agreed rules, norms, and values. These local institutions are cooperating well, successfully regulating, managing, and protecting agricultural, forest, and pasture lands, and maintaining the monuments in Lo-manthang for centuries. However, recent social-environmental dynamics such as climate change, migration, and modernization are reducing the relevancies of traditional norms and practices. Nevertheless, the institutions are working hard to continue their existence by frequently modifying their rules and norms.
Funder
University Grants Commission- Nepal
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference45 articles.
1. Agrawal, Arun. 2008. The role of local institutions in adaptation to climate change.
2. Barnes, Jessica, and Michael R. Dove. 2015. Introduction. In Climate cultures: Anthropological perspectives on climate change, ed. J. Barnes and M.R. Dove, 1–21. Yale University Press.
3. Central Bureau of Statistics. 2012. National population and housing census 2011 (village development committee/municipality). Government of Nepal National Planning Commission Secretariat. Central Bureau of Statistics.
4. Central Bureau of Statistics. 2022. (Press release on initial result of National Census on Population and Housing-Nepal. Accessed from: https://censusnepal.cbs.gov.np/Home/Details?tpid=2&dcid=27a1b4d1-9a2a-4205-96be-1c540c24f193.
5. Chhetri, Ram Bahadur 1999. The rhetoric and realities of people’s participation in conservation and development in Nepal: An anthropological perspective. In R. B. Chhetri & O. Gurung (Eds.), Anthropology and Sociology of Nepal: Cultures, Societies, Ecology and Development (pp. 192–211). Sociological and Anthropological Society of Nepal (SASON).