Abstract
Abstract
Background
This cross-sectional study describes a survey designed to fill knowledge gaps regarding farm management practices, parlour management practices and implemented technologies, milking management practices, somatic cell count (SCC) control strategies, farmer demographics and attitudes around SCC management on a sample of Irish dairy farms.
Results
We categorized 376 complete responses by herd size quartile and calving pattern. The average respondent herd was 131 cows with most (82.2%) operating a seasonal calving system. The median monthly bulk tank somatic cell count for seasonal calving systems was 137,000 cells/ml (range 20,000 – 1,269,000 cells/ml), 170,000 cells/ml for split-calving systems (range 46,000 – 644,000 cells/ml) and 186,000 cells/ml for ‘other’ herds (range 20,000 – 664,000 cells/ml). The most common parlour types were swing-over herringbones (59.1%) and herringbones with recording jars (22.2%). The average number of units across herringbone parlours was 15, 49 in rotary parlours and two boxes on automatic milking system (AMS) farms. The most common parlour technologies were in-parlour feeding systems (84.5%), automatic washers on the bulk tank (72.8%), automatic cluster removers (57.9%), and entrance or exit gates controlled from the parlour pit (52.2%). Veterinary professionals, farming colleagues and processor milk quality advisors were the most commonly utilised sources of advice for SCC management (by 76.9%, 50.0% and 39.2% of respondents respectively).
Conclusions
In this study, we successfully utilised a national survey to quantify farm management practices, parlour management practices and technology adoption levels, milking management practices, SCC control strategies and farmer demographics on 376 dairy farms in the Republic of Ireland. Rotary and AMS parlours had the most parlour technologies of any parlour type. Technology add-ons were generally less prevalent on farms with smaller herds. Despite finding areas for improvement with regard to frequency of liner changes, glove-wearing practices and engagement with bacteriology of milk samples, we also found evidence of high levels of documentation of mastitis treatments and high use of post-milking teat disinfection. We discovered that Irish dairy farmers are relatively content in their careers but face pressures regarding changes to the legislation around prudent antimicrobial use in their herds.
Funder
Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) & the Department of Agriculture, Food and Marine on behalf of the Government of Ireland through the VistaMilk centre
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference72 articles.
1. (Ibec) DII. Irish Dairy Industry Economic & Social Snapshot . [cited 2023 Aug 15]. https://www.ibec.ie/dairyindustryireland/our-dairy-story/economics-and-social#:~:text=The dairy industry is a,employment focused in rural areas
2. McCoy F. Mastitis Control Programmes - The Irish Experience. In: Proceedings of the British Mastitis Conference, Sixways, Worcester. 2012:65–9.
3. Halasa T, Huijps K, Østerås O, Hogeveen H. Economic effects of bovine mastitis and mastitis management: A review. Vet Q. 2007;29(1):18–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2007.9695224.
4. Seegers H, Fourichon C, Beaudeau F. Production effects related to mastitis and mastitis economics in dairy cattle herds. Vet Res. 2003/10/15. 2003;34(5):475–91. https://doi.org/10.1051/vetres:2003027
5. European Union. European Council Directive 92/46/EEC of 16 June 1992. Laying down the health rules for the production and placing on the market of raw milk, heat-treated milk and milk-based products. Off J Eur Communities. 1992;35(L268):1–32.