Author:
Maximore Leroy S.,Mohammed Abdul Gafaru,Issahaku Gyesi Razak,Sackey Samuel,Kenu Ernest
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The use of institutional delivery services is essential for improving maternal and child health. However, studies in Liberia reveal over 20% of women still deliver at home. We assessed the prevalence and associated factors of home delivery among women of reproductive age in Margibi County, Liberia.
Methods
We conducted a cross-sectional study among 438 women of reproductive age in Margibi County. Data were obtained using a semi-structured questionnaire. A simple random sampling approach was used to select the participants for the study. We performed binary logistic regression to identify factors influencing home delivery. Findings were summarized into tables displaying the frequencies, percentages, crude, and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results
Prevalence of home delivery in the County was 90.6% (95% CI = 87.5 – 93.0). Women who were ≥ 31 years (aOR = 6.74, 95%CI = 2.86—15.90), women who had two or more children (aOR = 9.68, 95%CI = 4.07—22.99) and those who had rapid onset of labor (aOR = 6.35, 95%CI = 1.59 – 25.27) were associated with increased odds of home delivery. Good attitude of health workers (aOR = 0.01, 95%CI = 0.001 – 0.08) and the availability of transport to the nearest health facility (aOR = 0.01, 95%CI = 0.003 – 0.03) were factors associated with a decreased odds of home delivery among the study participants.
Conclusion
The high prevalence of home delivery in the county is a call for urgent interventions by the government of Liberia and various non-governmental organizations. The government may need to supply the county with ambulances and ensure in-service training of health workers on good attitudes.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference38 articles.
1. Hidengwa H, Hoëbes KH, Lukolo LN, Kimera LC. Factors affecting utilization of child delivery services among multiparous women in Oshana Region, Namibia. Int J Med Sci Health Res. 2020;4(01):24–34.
2. Sarmento DR. WHO recommendation on partnership with Traditional Birth Attendants (TBAs). Asia Pac Fam Med. 2014;13:1–6.
3. Boah M, Mahama AB, Ayamga EA. They receive antenatal care in health facilities, yet do not deliver there: predictors of health facility delivery by women in rural Ghana. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):1–10.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention of measles, rubella, congenital rubella syndrome, and mumps, 2013: summary recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR. 2013;62(4):1–34.
5. Baffour-Awuah A, Mwini-Nyaledzigbor PP, Richter S. Enhancing focused antenatal care in Ghana: an exploration into perceptions of practicing midwives. Int J Africa Nurs Sci. 2015;2:59–64.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献