Author:
Jin Yuhua,Wu Yanpeng,Li Jing
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Although pregnancy and childbirth comprise a life-course that most midwives experience, whether their own experiences of childbirth resonate with other women during childbirth remains to be determined. In this study, we therefore characterized midwives’ empathic capabilities and defined their underlying factors.
Method
We conducted a cross-sectional study with data from 464 midwives in Guangdong, China, that were collected through the “Chinese version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy for Health Professionals (JSE-HP).” This questionnaire contains sections related to midwife demographics and delivery characteristics. We then implemented multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify empathy-related factors.
Results
Our analysis revealed 303 (65.3%) participants in the high-empathy group while 161 (34.7%) were in the middle-empathy group. Compared with the reference groups, these results indicated that higher empathy was associated with an elevated educational level (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.04–3.25), high monthly salary (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.11–4.80), and no shift work (OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.09–7.63). The odds of a high empathy score were higher for midwives who experienced two childbirths (2.27, 1.11–4.66) and for those who had children under the age of 3 years (2.81, 1.34–5.92).
Conclusion
Midwives possess a moderate-to-high level of empathy, and the greater the number of childbirths they experienced and the younger their children, the higher their reported empathy score. This study contributes novel information regarding the empathic behavior of midwives toward women who give birth in China.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference51 articles.
1. Arbour MW, Gordon IK, Saftner M, Tanner T. The experience of sleep deprivation for midwives practicing in the United States. Midwifery. 2020;89:102782.
2. Krausé SS, Minnie CS, Coetzee SK. The characteristics of compassionate care during childbirth according to midwives: a qualitative descriptive inquiry. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):304.
3. Brodie P. ‘Midwifing the midwives’: addressing the empowerment, safety of, and respect for, the world's midwives. Midwifery. 2013;29(10):1075–6.
4. Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4(4):CD004667.
5. McCrea BH, Wright ME, Murphy-Black T. Differences in midwives' approaches to pain relief in labour. Midwifery. 1998;14(3):174–80.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献