Author:
Kachi Yuko,Fujiwara Takeo,Inoue Akiomi,Baba Sachiko,Eguchi Hisashi,Ohta Hiroshi,Tsutsumi Akizumi
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Pregnancy discrimination in the workplace is prevalent worldwide. However, few studies have examined the effects of pregnancy discrimination on mothers’ perinatal mental health. We aimed to investigate the association between pregnancy discrimination and postpartum depressive symptoms, and the mediation effects of prenatal depressive symptoms on this association.
Methods
Our sample consisted of 285 Japanese women employed during pregnancy who completed a baseline online survey in May 2020 and a follow-up mail survey two months postpartum. Pregnancy discrimination was defined as exposure to any of 16 forms of disadvantageous treatment or harassment related to pregnancy, prohibited by national guidelines. Prenatal (assessed at baseline) and postpartum (assessed at follow-up) depressive symptoms were measured using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Multiple linear regression and mediation analyses were performed overall and stratified by regular (permanent) and non-regular (precarious) employees.
Results
Overall, 23.9% of participants experienced pregnancy discrimination during pregnancy. After adjusting for potential confounders, pregnancy discrimination was significantly associated with postpartum depressive symptoms (coefficient 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65–2.88). When stratified by employment type, these effects were observable among non-regular employees (coefficient 2.51, 95% CI 0.45–4.57) but not regular employees. Mediation analysis showed that prenatal depressive symptoms mediated 57.1% (95% CI 20.1–94.1%) of the association between pregnancy discrimination and postpartum depressive symptoms among all participants, with a greater effect among non-regular employees (64.1% [95% CI 18.5–109.8%]).
Conclusions
Pregnancy discrimination has adverse effects on postpartum depressive symptoms, partially through prenatal depressive symptoms, especially among non-regular employees. To prevent perinatal depression in female workers, employers should comply with legislation and take preventive measures against pregnancy discrimination, while considering vulnerable employees.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference35 articles.
1. Byron RA, Roscigno VJ. Relational power, legitimation, and pregnancy discrimination. Gend Soc. 2014;28(3):435–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243214523123.
2. Adams L, Winterbotham M, Oldfield K, McLeish J, Large A, Stuart A, et al. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills and the Equality and Human Rights Commission. Pregnancy and maternity-related discrimination and disadvantage: experiences of mothers; 2016. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/pregnancy-and-maternity-related-discrimination-and-disadvantage-final-reports. Accessed 13 Jan 2022.
3. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Understanding and utilizing labour laws: basic knowledge necessary for work (revised in June 2017); 2017. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/000494156.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2022.
4. Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training (JILPT). Survey report on unfavorable treatments because of pregnancy and sexual harassment; 2016. http://www.jil.go.jp/institute/research/2016/150.html. Accessed 13 Jan 2022.
5. Kachi Y, Fujiwara T, Eguchi H, Inoue A, Baba S, Ohta H, et al. Association between maternity harassment and depression during pregnancy amid the COVID-19 state of emergency. J Occup Health. 2021;63: e12196. https://doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12196.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献