Author:
Mengmei Yuan,Meizhen Zhao,Tieying Zeng,Meiliyang Wu,Ye Chen,Ke Zhang,AiQing Tu
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Childbirth preparation plays an important role in reducing maternal mortality and improving women’s childbirth experience. Evaluating childbirth readiness levels before and after interventions provides a basis for formulating more targeted and effective interventions. However, existing tools only assess partial childbirth preparation or have limited evidence of reliability and validity. The aim of this study was thus to develop a new instrument for use during the third trimester to comprehensively assess the readiness level of pregnant women, and test the scale’s psychometric properties.
Methods
The scale was developed through exploratory mixed methods including qualitative and quantitative phases. A literature review and in-depth semi-structured interviews were utilized to identify the scale items. A Delphi expert consultation evaluated the content validity. Psychometric testing was conducted in a convenience sample of 731 pregnant women in the third trimester (recruited from 3 tertiary hospitals in Hubei province in China). Item analysis was used to screen items; exploratory factor analysis was performed to extract factors; confirmatory factor analysis was performed to evaluate fit on the factor structures.
Results
The final scale consisted of four dimensions and 18 items that explained 65.8% of the total variance. Confirmative factor analysis (CFA) model showed that the 4-factor model fits the data well. The total Cronbach alpha coefficient of the total scale and 4 factors was 0.935 and 0.853–0.914. The split-half reliability was 0.880. The dimensions comprised “Self-management”, “Information literacy”, “Birth confidence” and “Birth plan”.
Conclusions
The childbirth readiness scale we developed has good reliability and validity, and can be used to comprehensively assess the readiness level of pregnant women. In addition to understanding the overall level of women’s childbirth readiness, using subscale scores, improvements can be targeted to specific areas of the preparation for childbirth, to improve the efficiency of the intervention.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference54 articles.
1. Khaled M, Corner GW, Horton K, Khoddam H, Stoycos S, Saxbe DE. Prenatal relationship conflict behavior predicts childbirth experiences and birth outcomes. J Fam Psychol. 2020;34(6):759–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000650.
2. WHO. Maternal mortality: Levels and trends 2000 to 2017. [EB/OL]. (2019–09–19) [2021–02–26]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241516488.
3. WHO. Birth and emergency preparedness in antenatal care. Intergrated manag pregnancy childbirth. 2006; 6. Available from: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Birth+and+emergency+preparedness+in+antenatal+care#3.
4. Tesfaye A, Gudeta T, Mekonnon R. Factors associated with birth preparedness and complication readiness among pregnant women in Bench Maji Zone, Southwest Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2019;29(5):567–76. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v29i5.6.
5. Baraki Z, Wendem F, Gerensea H, Teklay H. Husbands involvement in birth preparedness and complication readiness in Axum town, Tigray region, Ethiopia, 2017. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2338-z.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献