Author:
Rocha Aline S.,Paixao Enny S.,Alves Flavia Jôse O.,Falcão Ila R.,Silva Natanael J.,Teixeira Camila S. S.,Ortelan Naiá,Fiaccone Rosemeire L.,Rodrigues Laura C.,Ichihara Maria Yury,Barreto Mauricio L.,de Almeida Marcia F.,de Cássia Ribeiro-Silva Rita
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Cesarean section (CS) rates are increasing worldwide and are associated with negative maternal and child health outcomes when performed without medical indication. However, there is still limited knowledge about the association between high CS rates and early-term births. This study explored the association between CSs and early-term births according to the Robson classification.
Methods
A population-based, cross-sectional study was performed with routine registration data of live births in Brazil between 2012 and 2019. We used the Robson classification system to compare groups with expected high and low CS rates. We used propensity scores to compare CSs to vaginal deliveries (1:1) and estimated associations with early-term births using logistic regression.
Results
A total of 17,081,685 live births were included. Births via CS had higher odds of early-term birth (OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.32–1.32) compared to vaginal deliveries. Births by CS to women in Group 2 (OR 1.50; 95% CI 1.49–1.51) and 4 (OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.56–1.58) showed the highest odds of early-term birth, compared to vaginal deliveries. Increased odds of an early-term birth were also observed among births by CS to women in Group 3 (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.29–1.31), compared to vaginal deliveries. In addition, live births by CS to women with a previous CS (Group 5 - OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.35–1.37), a single breech pregnancy (Group 6 - OR 1.16; 95% CI 1.11–1.21, and Group 7 - OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.16–1.23), and multiple pregnancies (Group 8 - OR 1.46; 95% CI 1.40–1.52) had high odds of an early-term birth, compared to live births by vaginal delivery.
Conclusions
CSs were associated with increased odds of early-term births. The highest odds of early-term birth were observed among those births by CS in Robson Groups 2 and 4.
Funder
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Wellcome Trust
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference38 articles.
1. Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros FC, Juan L, Moller A-B, Say L, Hosseinpoor AR, Yi M, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. The Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341–8.
2. Domingues RMSM, Dias MAB, Nakamura-Pereira M, Torres JA, d’Orsi E, Pereir APE, Schilithz AOC. Leal MdC: process of decision-making regarding the mode of birth in Brazil: from the initial preference of women to the final mode of birth. Cad Saúde Pública. 2014;30(1):101–S116.
3. Leal MdC. : Childbirth and birth in Brazil: an evolving scenario. In., vol. 34: SciELO Brasil; 2018.
4. Brasil. Portaria nº 1.459, de 24 de junho de 2011. In. Edited by Saúde Md: Diário Oficial da União; 2011.
5. Brasil. Resolução Normativa–RN Nº 368, de 6 de janeiro de 2015. In. Edited by Saúde Md, Suplementar ANdS; 2015.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献