Author:
Bully Paola,Artieta-Pinedo Isabel,Paz-Pascual Carmen,García-Álvarez Arturo,Alvarez Sonia,Amorrortu Pilar,Blas Mónica,Cabeza Inés,Estalella Itziar,Fernández Ana Cristina,Gutiérrez de Terán-Moreno Gloria,Legarra Kata,Lozano Gorane,Maquibar Amaia,Moreno-López David,Mulas Mª Jesús,Pérez Covadonga,Rodríguez Angela,Sáenz de Santamaría Mercedes,Sánchez Jesús,Villanueva Gema,Espinosa Maite,
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Despite the fact that the Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescents’ Health (2016–2030) recognises the special importance of care for women during the postpartum period, thus highlighting the need to identify and measure any condition that may affect the welfare of pregnant women in any way, this is one of the most neglected stages in the health system. Given the absence in our area of global, efficient instruments, the objective of this study was to design a complete, specific measurement tool with good metric qualities in digital format for the evaluation of self-reported health and well-being during the puerperium, to conform to what was proposed by the ICHOM.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was carried out to evaluate the psychometric characteristics of a digital measurement tool. The development of the tool was carried out in 4 steps, following the recommendations of the International Test Commission. It was tested on 280 puerperas attending primary healthcare appointments in the Basque Healthcare System (Osakidetza), and they did the newly created survey, answering all the questions that had been selected as the gold standard. The average age of the women was 34.93 (SD = 4.80). The analysis of the psychometric characteristics was based on mixed procedures of expert judgment (a focus group of healthcare professionals, an item evaluation questionnaire and interviews with users) and quantitative evaluations (EFA, CFA, and correlation with gold standard, ordinal alpha and McDonald’s omega).
Results
The final version of the tool comprised 99 items that evaluate functional state, incontinence, sexuality, breastfeeding, adaptation to the role of mother and mental health, and all of these questions can be used globally or partially. It was found that the scores were valid and reliable, which gives metric guarantees for using the tool in our area.
Conclusions
The use of this comprehensive concise tool with good psychometric properties will allow women to take stock of their situation, assess if they have the necessary resources, in psychological and social terms, and work together with midwives and other healthcare professionals on the most deficient areas.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference63 articles.
1. Sacks E, Langlois ÉV. Postnatal care: increasing coverage, equity, and quality. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(7):e442–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30092-4. Epub 2016 May 13. PMID: 27185467.
2. WHO. Technical Consultation on Postpartum and Postnatal Care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. PMID: 26269861.
3. Daly D, Higgins A, Hannon S, O’Malley D, Wuytack F, Moran P, Cusack C, Begley C. Trajectories of postpartum recovery: what is known and not known. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2022;65(3):594–610. https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0000000000000726. Epub 2022 Jun 29. PMID: 35797600.
4. Grupo de trabajo de la Guía de práctica clínica de atención en el embarazo y puerperio. Guía de práctica clínica de atención en el embarazo y puerperio. Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad. Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias de Andalicía; 2014. Guías de Práctica Clínica en el SNS: AETSA 2011/10.
5. Lambermon FJ, van Duijnhoven NTL, Braat DDM, Kremer JAM, Dedding CWM. The unintended consequences of client-centred flexible planning in home-based postpartum care: a shift in care workers’ tasks and responsibilities. Midwifery. 2020;88:102737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102737. Epub 2020 May 20. PMID: 32554221.