Abstract
Abstract
Background
Surrogacy is one of the options in reproductive medicine that raises a lot of ethical, legal and psychological controversy. Surveying attitudes toward surrogacy plays an important role in building awareness of this phenomenon in the society, which may help eliminate its stigma. In this study authors aimed to develop and validate a scale to assess the attitudes towards surrogacy.
Methods
In this study cross-sectional design was implemented. Development process of the Attitude towards Surrogacy Scale (ATSS) included items development based on literature reviews, other existing questionnaires, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and reliability analysis using internal consistence coefficients. A pilot study using adult members of the public was conducted after consultation with the Expert Advisory Panel Board. The final survey, which was used in this study, consisted of 24 items, which were organized into the four subscales: general opinion on surrogacy and its social context (7 items), financing and legalizing surrogacy (8 items), the acceptance of surrogacy (4 items), and attitudes towards the intended parents and children born through surrogacy (5 items). 442 individuals participated in this study.
Results
The final version of Attitude towards Surrogacy Scale (ATSS) consists of 15 items, grouped in three subscales. Final version of the ATSS showed that the three-factor model indicated an acceptable model fit: Chi-square = 320.46, p < 0.01, df = 87, CFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.92, RMSEA = 0.078 (90% C.I.: 0.070–0.086), SRMR = 0.040 Reliability was assessed by calculating the McDonald's omega that ranged from 0.74 for the Surrogacy ethical context subscale to 0.94 for the overall ATSS score.
Conclusion
ATSS was developed to measure general attitude toward surrogacy with satisfying psychometric properties. The analysis of socio-demographic variables with ATSS showed that the most significant predictor of the general attitude towards surrogacy, and three aspects of surrogacy was being a religious person (profess a Catholic religion or profess another religion).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference49 articles.
1. Constantinidis D, Cook R. Australian perspectives on surrogacy: the influence of cognitions, psychological and demographic characteristics. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(4):1080–7 Available from: https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/humrep/der470 . Cited 2021 Dec 8 .
2. Gunnarsson Payne J, Korolczuk E, Mezinska S. Surrogacy relationships: a critical interpretative review. Upsala J Med Sci. 2020;125:183–91 Taylor and Francis Ltd.
3. Brannan S, Chrispin E, Davies M, English V, Mussell R, Sheather J, et al. Assisted Reproduction. In: Medical Ethics Today The BMA’s Handbook of Ethics and Law. New Jersey; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2012. 311–63.
4. Mirocha Ł. „Macierzyństwo zastępcze” w aktualnym orzecznictwie Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka. Prawa w Działaniu - Sprawy Cywilne. 2018;34:164–88.
5. Bhatia K, Martindale EA, Rustamov O, Nysenbaum AM. Surrogate pregnancy: An essential guide for clinicians. Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;11:49–54.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献