Using complaints from obstetric care for improving women’s birth experiences – a cross sectional study

Author:

Walløe Sisse,Bogh Søren Bie,Birkeland Søren Fryd,Pedersen Lone Kjeld,Lykkebo Annemette Wildfang,Andersen Lise Lotte Torvin,Frederiksen-Møller Britta,Morsø Lars

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Staff shortages and quality in obstetric care is a concern in most healthcare systems and a hot topic in the public debate that has centred on complaints about deficient care. However there has been a lack of empirical data to back the debate. The aim of this study was to analyse and describe complaints in obstetric care. Further, to compare the obstetric complaint pattern to complaints from women about other hospital services. Materials and methods We used the Healthcare Complaints Analysis Tool to code, analyse and extract contents of obstetric complaint cases in a region of Denmark between 2016 and 2021. We compared the obstetric complaint pattern to all other hospital complaint cases in the same period regarding female patients at a large University Hospital in a cross-sectional study. Results Complaints regarding obstetric care differed from women’s complaints regarding other healthcare services. Women from obstetric care raised more problems per complaint, and tended to complain more about relational issues indicated by odds for complaints about staff shortage four times higher in the obstetric care group. Women from obstetric care had a lower proportion of compensation claims. Conclusion Systematic complaint analysis acknowledged women’s experience in obstetric care and may point to areas that potentially need further attention. Complaints from obstetric care show that women experience deficiencies related to relational problems like recognition and individualized support compared to complaints from women receiving other hospital healthcare services.

Funder

University Library of Southern Denmark

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Reference29 articles.

1. Sundhedsstyrelsen. Anbefalinger for organisering af fødetilbud. Sundhedsstyrelsen, 2021; 2021.

2. MBHS H. Fødekrisens mange fædre [the many fathers of the birth crisis]. Weekendavisen [the Weekend Paper]. 2021.

3. Obstitrcians KAKa. Rigshospitalets forhold er elendige [The conditions at the Capital hospital are miserable]. Politiken 2021.

4. Maja F, Marie N, Marie B. The impact of obstetric interventions and complications on women’s satisfaction with childbirth a population based cohort study including 16,000 women. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth; 2019.

5. Nystedt A, Hildingsson I. Women’s and men’s negative experience of child birth-A cross-sectional survey. Women Birth. 2018;31(2):103–9.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3