Smokers’ utilization of quitting methods and vaping during pregnancy: an empirical cluster analysis of 2016–2018 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) data in seven US states

Author:

Wang Xi,Lee Nora L.,Burstyn Igor

Abstract

Abstract Background Patterns of utilization of numerous smoking cessation methods among pregnant women amidst the increasing popularity of vaping (use of e-cigarettes) remains unknown. Methods This study included 3,154 mothers who self-reported smoking around the time of conception and delivered live births in 2016–2018 in seven US states. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of smoking women based on their utilization of 10 surveyed quitting methods and vaping during pregnancy. Results We identified four subgroups of smoking mothers with different utilization patterns of quitting methods during pregnancy: 22.0% reported “not trying to quit”; 61.4% tried to “quit on my own” without any behavioral or pharmacological assistance; 3.7% belonged to the “vaping” subgroup; and 12.9% utilized “wide-ranging methods” with higher use rate of multiple approaches, such as quit line and nicotine patch. Compared to mothers “not trying to quit,” the subgroup trying to “quit on my own” were more likely to be abstinent (adjusted OR 4.95, 95% CI 2.82–8.35) or to reduce the number of cigarettes smoked daily (adjusted OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.31–4.60) in late pregnancy, and these improvements lasted into early postpartum. We did not observe a measurable reduction in smoking among the “vaping” subgroup or women trying to quit with “wide-ranging methods”. Conclusions We identified four subgroups of smoking mothers with different utilization patterns of eleven quitting methods during pregnancy. Pre-pregnancy smokers who tried to “quit on my own” were most likely to be abstinent or to reduce smoking amount.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3