Author:
Zhou Xu,Li Ting,Kuang Haiyan,Zhou Ying,Xie Donghua,He Jian,Xiao Juan,Chen Chanchan,Jiang Yurong,Fang Junqun,Wang Hua
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To describe the prevalence and epidemiology of congenital polydactyly and syndactyly in Hunan Province, China, 2016–2020.
Methods
Data were obtained from the Birth Defects Surveillance System in Hunan Province, China, 2016–2020. Prevalence of birth defects (polydactyly or syndactyly) is the number of cases per 1000 births (unit: ‰). Prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by the log-binomial method. Chi-square trend tests (χ2trend) were used to determine trends in prevalence by year. Crude odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to examine the association of each demographic characteristic with polydactyly and syndactyly.
Results
Our study included 847,755 births, and 14,459 birth defects were identified, including 1,888 polydactyly and 626 syndactyly cases, accounting for 13.06% and 4.33% of birth defects, respectively. The prevalences of total birth defects, polydactyly, and syndactyly were 17.06‰ (95%CI: 16.78–17.33), 2.23‰ (95%CI: 2.13–2.33), and 0.74‰ (95%CI: 0.68–0.80), respectively. Most polydactyly (96.77%) and syndactyly (95.69%) were diagnosed postnatally (within 7 days). From 2016 to 2020, the prevalences of polydactyly were 1.94‰, 2.07‰, 2.20‰, 2.54‰, and 2.48‰, respectively, showing an upward trend (χ2trend = 19.48, P < 0.01); The prevalences of syndactyly were 0.62‰, 0.66‰, 0.77‰, 0.81‰, and 0.89‰, respectively, showing an upward trend (χ2trend = 10.81, P = 0.03). Hand polydactyly (2.26‰ vs. 1.33‰, OR = 1.69, 95%CI: 1.52–1.87) and hand syndactyly (0.43‰ vs. 0.28‰, OR = 1.42, 95%CI: 1.14–1.76) were more common in males than females. Polydactyly (2.67‰ vs. 1.93‰, OR = 1.38, 95%CI: 1.26–1.51) and syndactyly (0.91‰ vs. 0.62‰, OR = 1.47, 95%CI: 1.26–1.72) were more common in urban areas than in rural areas. Compared to maternal age 25–29, hand polydactyly was more common in maternal age < 20 (2.48‰ vs. 1.74‰, OR = 1.43, 95%CI: 1.01–2.02) or ≥ 35 (2.25‰ vs. 1.74‰, OR = 1.30, 95%CI: 1.12–1.50).
Conclusion
In summary, we have described the prevalence and epidemiology of polydactyly and syndactyly from hospital-based surveillance in Hunan Province, China, 2016–2020. Our findings make some original contributions to the field, which may be valuable for future research.
Funder
A study on the predictive value of placental derived DNA methylation status in maternal peripheral blood for preeclampsia
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. World-Health-Organization. Congenital anomalies 2020 [cited 2022 2022-1-1]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/congenital-anomalies.
2. Corsello G, Giuffrè M. Congenital malformations. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012; 25 Suppl 1: 25–29. Epub 20120314. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2012.664943 PMID: 22356564.
3. National-Library-of-Medicine. Polydactyly 1994 [updated 199420230101]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/68017689.
4. Medicine NL. Syndactyly 1994 [cited 2023 20230101]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/68013576.
5. Malik S. Polydactyly: phenotypes, genetics and classification. Clin Genet. 2014; 85(3): 203–212. Epub 20131018. https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.12276 PMID: 24020795.