Author:
Austad Kirsten E.,Rao Sowmya R.,Hibberd Patricia L.,Patel Archana B.
Funder
National Institutes of Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Frankman EA, Wang L, Bunker CH, Lowder JL. Episiotomy in the United States: has anything changed? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(5):573. e1-573.e7.
2. Thacker SB, Banta HD. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature, 1860–1980. Vol. 38, Obstetrical & gynecological survey. Baltimore:; 1983. pp. 322–38.
3. Harrison MS, Ali S, Pasha O, Saleem S, Althabe F, Berrueta M, et al. A prospective population-based study of maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes in the setting of prolonged labor, obstructed labor and failure to progress in low- and middle-income countries. Reprod Health. 2015;12(Suppl 2):S9.
4. Berkowitz L, Foust-Wright C, UpToDate. Waltham MA, Editors CJ, Lockwood K, Eckler, editors. ; 2020 [cited 2021 Oct 12]. Approach to episiotomy. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/approach-to-episiotomy?search=episiotomy&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~62&usage_type=default&display_rank=1#references
5. Graham ID, Carroli G, Davies C, Medves JM. Episiotomy rates around the world: an update. Birth. 2005;32(3):219–23.