Abstract
Abstract
Background and aim
In 21st century, there has been an increasing interest in vaginal birth after previous caesarean section (VBAC) in Cyprus, a country with a very high operative birth rate. Research-based evidence of women’s VBAC experiences in Cyprus is non-existent, despite its significance for the well-being of mothers and families. The aim of this study is to gain insight into the women’s lived experience of VBAC in Cyprus. In this study women’s experiences of VBAC are explored for the first time in Cyprus.
Method
The study is qualitative and exploratory in nature. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 10 women, who experienced vaginal birth after a previous caesarean section (VBAC) in Cyprus. A descriptive phenomenological approach was employed for the analysis of data.
Results
Analysis of data yielded four major themes: (a) medicalization of childbirth, (b) preparing for a VBAC, (c) birth environment, and (d) healing through VBAC. On the whole, the women interviewed described their previous experience of CS as traumatic, in contrast to vaginal childbirth. VBAC was considered an utterly positive experience that made the women feel empowered and proud of themselves.
Conclusion
This study offers valuable insight into a newly researched subject in Cyprus, which is necessary for advancing perinatal care in Cyprus. The findings indicate that women need evidence-based information, guidelines on birthing options, good preparation with tailored information and personalized care for a successful vaginal birth after a previous caesarean section. Proper, non-biased, consultations are a main factor that affects women’s choice of mode of birth. The introduction of new, women-friendly perinatal strategies that respect and promote childbirth rights is imperative in the case of Cyprus. All women have the right to exercise informed choice and the choice to alternative birthing options.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference40 articles.
1. Betran AP, Ye J, Moller A, et al. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6:e005671.
2. Eurostat. Caesarean Births in the EU member states. 2017 viewed https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/en/web/products-eurostat-news/-/DDN-20191217-1. Αccessed 18 Mar 2021).
3. WHO. WHO recommendations for augmentation of labour. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/112825/1/978924150736_eng.pdf. Αccessed 18 March 2021
4. Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros FC, Juan L, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341–8.
5. Field A, Haloob R. Complications of caesarean section. Obstetr Gynaecol. 2016;18(4):265–72.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献