Abstract
Abstract
Background
Despite significant government investments to improve birth outcomes in low and middle-income countries over the past several decades, stillbirth and neonatal mortality continue to be persistent public health problems. While they are different outcomes, there is little evidence regarding their shared and unique population-level risk factors over a mother’s reproductive lifespan. Data gaps and measurement challenges have left several areas in this field unexplored, especially assessing the risk of stillbirth or neonatal mortality over successive pregnancies to the same woman. This study aimed to assess the risk of stillbirth and neonatal mortality in Indonesia during 2000–2014, using maternal birth histories from the Indonesia Family Life Survey panel data.
Methods
Data from three panels were combined to create right-censored birth histories. There were 5,002 unique multiparous mothers with at least two singleton births in the sample. They reported 12,761 total births and 12,507 live births. Random effects (RE) models, which address the dependency of variance in births to the same mother, were fitted assuming births to the same mother shared unobserved risk factors unique to the mother.
Results
The main finding was that there having had a stillbirth increased the odds of another stillbirth nearly seven-fold and that of subsequent neonatal mortality by over two-fold. Having had a neonatal death was not associated with a future neonatal death. Mothers who were not educated and nullipara were much more likely to experience a neonatal death while mothers who had a prior neonatal death had no risk of another neonatal death due to unmeasured factors unique to the mother.
Conclusions
The results suggest that for stillbirths, maternal heterogeneity, as explained by a prior stillbirth, could capture underlying pathology while the relationship between observed risk factors and neonatal mortality could be much more dependent on context. Establishing previous adverse outcomes such as neonatal deaths and stillbirth could help identify high-risk pregnancies during prenatal care, inform interventions, and improve health policy.
Funder
CUNY Institute for Demographic Research, Baruch College, NY
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference43 articles.
1. WHO 2020 Children: improving survival and well-being Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/children-reducing-mortality. Cited 26 Oct 2021
2. Atlas SW. Infant mortality as an indicator of health and health care. In: In excellent health: setting the record straight on America’s health care. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, Stanford University; 2011. p. 47–96 (Hoover Institution Press publication).
3. S Leisher Stillbirth Advocacy Working Group 2021 Leaving no one behind: Where are 2.6 million stillbirths? Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.l6986/rr. Cited 26 Oct 2021
4. Heazell AEP, Siassakos D, Blencowe H, Burden C, Bhutta ZA, Cacciatore J, et al. Stillbirths: economic and psychosocial consequences. Lancet. 2016;387(10018):604–16.
5. Ellis A, Chebsey C, Storey C, Bradley S, Jackson S, Flenady V, et al. Systematic review to understand and improve care after stillbirth: a review of parents’ and healthcare professionals’ experiences. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4727309/. Cited 24 Nov 2020
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献