Abstract
Abstract
Background
Caesarean section is a clinical intervention aimed to save the lives of women and their newborns. In Ghana, studies have reported inequalities in use among women of different socioeconomic backgrounds. However, geographical differentials at the district level where health interventions are implemented, have not been systematically studied. This study examined geographical inequalities in caesarean births at the district level in Ghana. The study investigated how pregnancy complications and birth risks, access to health care and affluence correlate with geographical inequalities in caesarean section uptake.
Methods
The data for the analysis was derived from the 2017 Ghana Maternal Health Survey. The log-binomial Bayesian Geoadditive Semiparametric regression technique was used to examine the extent of geographical clustering in caesarean births at the district level and their spatial correlates.
Results
In Ghana, 16.0% (95% CI = 15.3, 16.8) of births were via caesarean section. Geospatial analysis revealed a strong spatial dependence in caesarean births, with a clear north-south divide. Low frequencies of caesarean births were observed among districts in the northern part of the country, while those in the south had high frequencies. The predominant factor associated with the spatial differentials was affluence rather than pregnancy complications and birth risk and access to care.
Conclusions
Strong geographical inequalities in caesarean births exist in Ghana. Targeted and locally relevant interventions including health education and policy support are required at the district level to address the overuse and underuse of caesarean sections, to correspond to the World Health Organisation recommended optimal threshold of 10% to 15%.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference38 articles.
1. Lanowski J-S, von Kaisenberg CS. The surgical technique of caesarean section: what is evidence based? Caesarean Sect. 2018;4:63–77.
2. Temmerman M, Mohiddin A. Cesarean section: more than a maternal health issue. PLoS Med. 2021;18(10):e1003792.
3. WHO. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
4. Betran AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(6):e005671.
5. Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJ, Barros FC, Juan L, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341–8.