Clinical handover communication at maternity shift changes and women's safety in Banjul, the Gambia: a mixed-methods study

Author:

Rickard Faith,Lu Fides,Gustafsson Lotta,MacArthur Christine,Cummins Carole,Coker Ivan,Wilson Amie,Mane Kebba,Manneh Kebba,Manaseki-Holland Semira

Abstract

Abstract Background Clinical handover is a vital communication process for patient safety; transferring patient responsibility between healthcare professionals (HCPs). Exploring handover processes in maternity care is fundamental for service quality, addressing continuity of care and maternal mortality. Methods This mixed-methods study was conducted in all three maternity hospitals in Banjul, The Gambia. Shift-to-shift maternity handovers were observed and compared against a standard investigating content and environment. Semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with doctors, midwives and nurses explored handover experience. Results One hundred ten nurse/midwife shift-to-shift handovers were observed across all shift times and maternity wards; only 666 of 845 women (79%) were handed over. Doctors had no scheduled handover. Shift-leads alone gave/received handover, delayed [median 35 min, IQR 24–45] 82% of the time; 96% of handovers were not confidential and 29% were disrupted. Standardised guidelines and training were lacking. A median 6 of 28 topics [IQR 5–9] were communicated per woman. Information varied significantly by time, high-risk classification and location. For women in labour, 10 [IQR 8–14] items were handed-over, 8 [IQR 5–11] for women classed ‘high-risk’, 5 [IQR 4–7] for ante/postnatal women (p < 0.001); > 50% had no care management plan communicated. Twenty-one interviews and two focus groups were conducted. Facilitators and barriers to effective handover surrounding three health service factors emerged; health systems (e.g. absence of formalised handover training), organisation culture (e.g. absence of multidisciplinary team handover) and individual clinician factors (e.g. practical barriers such as transportation difficulties in getting to work). Conclusion Maternity handover was inconsistent, hindered by contextual barriers including lack of team communication and guidelines, delays, with some women omitted entirely. Findings alongside HCPs views demonstrate feasible opportunities for enhancing handover, thereby improving women's safety.

Funder

BMedSc Population and Health Sciences student funding

Arthur Thompson Trust

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Reference53 articles.

1. WHO. Trends in Maternal mortality,. to 2015: Estimates by WHO. UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division: World Health Organization; 1990. p. 2015.

2. UN General Assembly. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, 2015. Available: http://www.refworld.org/docid/57b6e3e44.html [Accessed Oct 2018].

3. Paxton A, Maine D, Freedman L, et al. The evidence for emergency obstetric care. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2005;88(2):181–93.

4. Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(8):1091–110.

5. WHO. Sexual and reproductive health. Standards for improving quality of maternal and newborn care in health facilities. 2016. Available: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/improving-mnh-health-facilities/en/. Accessed Nov 2018.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3