Author:
Rickard Faith,Lu Fides,Gustafsson Lotta,MacArthur Christine,Cummins Carole,Coker Ivan,Wilson Amie,Mane Kebba,Manneh Kebba,Manaseki-Holland Semira
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Clinical handover is a vital communication process for patient safety; transferring patient responsibility between healthcare professionals (HCPs). Exploring handover processes in maternity care is fundamental for service quality, addressing continuity of care and maternal mortality.
Methods
This mixed-methods study was conducted in all three maternity hospitals in Banjul, The Gambia. Shift-to-shift maternity handovers were observed and compared against a standard investigating content and environment. Semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with doctors, midwives and nurses explored handover experience.
Results
One hundred ten nurse/midwife shift-to-shift handovers were observed across all shift times and maternity wards; only 666 of 845 women (79%) were handed over. Doctors had no scheduled handover. Shift-leads alone gave/received handover, delayed [median 35 min, IQR 24–45] 82% of the time; 96% of handovers were not confidential and 29% were disrupted. Standardised guidelines and training were lacking.
A median 6 of 28 topics [IQR 5–9] were communicated per woman. Information varied significantly by time, high-risk classification and location. For women in labour, 10 [IQR 8–14] items were handed-over, 8 [IQR 5–11] for women classed ‘high-risk’, 5 [IQR 4–7] for ante/postnatal women (p < 0.001); > 50% had no care management plan communicated.
Twenty-one interviews and two focus groups were conducted. Facilitators and barriers to effective handover surrounding three health service factors emerged; health systems (e.g. absence of formalised handover training), organisation culture (e.g. absence of multidisciplinary team handover) and individual clinician factors (e.g. practical barriers such as transportation difficulties in getting to work).
Conclusion
Maternity handover was inconsistent, hindered by contextual barriers including lack of team communication and guidelines, delays, with some women omitted entirely. Findings alongside HCPs views demonstrate feasible opportunities for enhancing handover, thereby improving women's safety.
Funder
BMedSc Population and Health Sciences student funding
Arthur Thompson Trust
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference53 articles.
1. WHO. Trends in Maternal mortality,. to 2015: Estimates by WHO. UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division: World Health Organization; 1990. p. 2015.
2. UN General Assembly. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, 2015. Available: http://www.refworld.org/docid/57b6e3e44.html [Accessed Oct 2018].
3. Paxton A, Maine D, Freedman L, et al. The evidence for emergency obstetric care. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2005;88(2):181–93.
4. Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(8):1091–110.
5. WHO. Sexual and reproductive health. Standards for improving quality of maternal and newborn care in health facilities. 2016. Available: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/improving-mnh-health-facilities/en/. Accessed Nov 2018.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献