Abstract
Abstract
Background
There is limited evidence on effect of high and low dose oxytocin used for labor induction on perinatal outcomes. We compared perinatal outcomes among pregnant mothers who received the two different oxytocin regimens and identified risk factors associated with adverse perinatal outcomes.
Methods
Facility based comparative cross-sectional study was conducted in four hospitals of Ethiopia over eight month’s period during 2017/2018 year with 216 pregnant women who received high and low dose oxytocin for labor induction. Socio-demographics, reproductive characteristics of mothers and perinatal outcomes data were collected and entered into Epi-data version 3.1 and then exported to SPSS version 20 for cleaning and analysis. Chi-square test and logistic regression were done to see the effect of different oxytocin regimens on perinatal outcome. The result was presented using 95 % confidence interval of crude and adjusted odds ratios. P-value < 0.05 was used to declare statistical significance.
Result
Higher adverse perinatal outcomes (29 % vs. 13.9 %, p = 0.005) and higher non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern (23.1 % vs. 7.4 %, p = 0.001) was observed among mothers who received high dose oxytocin compared to mothers who received low dose oxytocin. Using high oxytocin dose [AOR = 2.4, 95 % CI: 1.1, 5.5], caesarean birth [AOR = 9.3, 95 %CI: 3.8, 22.5], instrumental birth [AOR = 7.7, 95 % CI: 2.1, 27.8], and antepartum hemorrhage [AOR = 17.8, 95 %CI: 1.9, 168.7] were risk factors of adverse perinatal outcomes.
Conclusions
There was significance difference in the occurrence of adverse perinatal outcomes among pregnant mothers who received high and low dose of oxytocin. Using high dose oxytocin, antepartum hemorrhage, caesarean birth and instrumental birth were associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. We recommend using low dose oxytocin for better perinatal outcomes.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference17 articles.
1. Deborah AW, Lili S. Abnormal Labor and Induction of Labor. In: Steven GG, Jennifer RN, Joe LS, et al. Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies, 7th edition. China: Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2017. p. 276–83.
2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Induction of labor. ACOG practice bulletin #107. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:386–97. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5.
3. Crane JMG, Young DC. Meta-analysis of low-dose versus high dose oxytocin for labor induction. J SOGC. 1998;20(13):1215–23. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/S0849-5831(16)31001-1.
4. Vogel JP, Souza JP, Gulmezoglu AM. Patterns and Outcomes of Induction of Labor in Africa and Asia: A Secondary Analysis of the WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Neonatal Health. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(6):e65612. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065612.
5. Wei SQ, Luo ZC, Qi HP, Xu H, Fraser WD. High-dose vs low-dose oxytocin for labor augmentation: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):296–304.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.03.007. Epub 2010 May 8. PMID: 20451894.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献