Utilisation of supplementary prenatal screening and diagnostics in Germany: cross-sectional study using data from the KUNO Kids Health Study

Author:

Mayer Johanna,Brandstetter Susanne,Tischer Christina,Seelbach-Göbel Birgit,Malfertheiner Sara Fill,Melter Michael,Kabesch Michael,Apfelbacher Christian,Arndt Petra,Baessler Andrea,Berneburg Mark,Böse- O’Reilly Stephan,Brunner Romuald,Buchalla Wolfgang,Malfertheiner Sara Fill,Franke Andre,Häusler Sebastian,Heid Iris,Herr Caroline,Högler Wolfgang,Kerzel Sebastian,Koller Michael,Leitzmann Michael,Rothfuß David,Rösch Wolfgang,Schaub Bianca,Weber Bernhard H. F.,Weidinger Stephan,Wellmann Sven,

Abstract

Abstract Background Appropriate health system utilisation during pregnancy is fundamental for maintaining maternal and child’s health. To study the use and determinants of supplementary prenatal screening and diagnostics in Germany this study provides comprehensive data. Methods We obtained data from a recently established prospective German birth cohort study, the KUNO Kids Health Study. Analyses are based on Andersen’s Behavioural Model of health system use, which distinguishes between predisposing (e.g. country of birth), enabling (e.g. health insurance) and need factors (e.g. at-risk pregnancy). We examined bi- and multivariate association with the use of supplementary prenatal screening and diagnostics using logistic regression. Results The study has a sample size of 1886 participating mothers. One fifth of the mothers investigated did not use any supplementary prenatal screening or diagnostics. Notably, the chance of using supplementary prenatal screening and diagnostics more than doubled if the pregnant woman had a private health insurance (OR 2.336; 95% CI 1.527–3.573). Higher maternal age (OR 1.038; 95% CI 1.006–1.071) and environmental tobacco smoke exposure (OR 1.465 95% CI 1.071–2.004) increased the use of supplementary prenatal screening and diagnostics. However, regarding need factors only having an at-risk-pregnancy (OR 1.688; 95% CI 1.271–2.241) showed an independent association. Conclusion The important role of the type of health insurance and the relatively small influence of need factors was surprising. Especially with respect to equity in accessing health care, this needs further attention.

Funder

research grants of the EU

German Federal Ministry for Education and Researc

University Children’s Hospital of the University of Regensburg

Clinic “St. Hedwig”

Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Reference48 articles.

1. Schäfers R, Kolip P. Gesundheitsmonitor: Zusatzangebote in der Schwangerschaft: Sichere Rundumversorgung oder Geschäft mit der Unsicherheit? 2015. p. 1–16.

2. Abalos E, Chamillard M, Diaz V, Tuncalp Ӧ, Gülmezoglu AM. Antenatal care for healthy pregnant women: A mapping of interventions from existing guidelines to inform the development of new WHO guidance on antenatal care. BJOG. 2016;123:519–28.

3. Kapaya H, Mercer E, Boffey F, Jones G, Mitchell C, Anumba D. Deprivation and poor psychosocial support are key determinants of late antenatal presentation and poor fetal outcomes--a combined retrospective and prospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015.

4. Mainz HW. des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschussesüber die ärztliche Betreuungwährend der Schwangerschaftund nach der Entbindung(“Mutterschafts-Richtlinien”): in der Fassung vom 10. Dezember 1985 (veröffentlicht im Bundesanzeiger Nr. 60 a vom 27. März 1986) zuletzt geändert am 20. August 2020 veröffentlicht im Bundesanzeiger AT 23.11.2020 B3 in Kraft getreten am 24. 2020. Available from: https://www.g-ba.de/downloads/62-492-2301/Mu-RL_2020-08-20_iK-2020-11-24.pdf.

5. Kolleck A, Sauter A. Aktueller Stand und Entwicklungen der Pränataldiagnostik: Endbericht zum Monitoring TAB Arbeitsbericht Nr 184. 2019 [cited 2020 Jan 5]. Available from: https://www.tab-beim-bundestag.de/de/pdf/publikationen/berichte/TAB-Arbeitsbericht-ab184.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3