Abstract
Abstract
Background
In 2018, USAID published a report based on Demographic and Health Surveys data on the relationship between men’s involvement and women and children’s health outcomes. Using a flawed operationalization of “men’s involvement,” USAID’s analysis implies that Senegalese men are not involved in women and children’s health.
Methods
The findings of this study come from 12 months of ethnographic research in Dakar, Senegal that examined the roles and responsibilities of expectant fathers. Research participants included 32 pregnant women and 27 expectant partners recruited from three maternity wards. Research methods included long-term, immersive participant observation and semi-structured interviews.
Results
Pregnant women in Senegal are surrounded by a kin-based network of care providers called the entourage who share responsibilities for support. Expectant fathers, as members of the entourage, are expected to provide financial and emotional support, while other members of the entourage are expected to undertake the responsibilities which USAID have designated as “men’s involvement.” Men typically do not undertake additional forms of care and support because they are considered “women’s business,” meaning that women actively discourage men from doing those things, in order to preserve women’s autonomy.
Conclusion
This research demonstrates that expectant fathers are involved in antenatal care in ways that USAID does not track through DHS. Further, I argue that USAID’s heterosexist, monogamous, and nuclear operationalization of “men’s involvement” aligns with a long history of Eurocentrism in development discourse which may be potentially harmful and obstructive to improving maternal and child health when the problem that is targeted is not a problem at all. This study is yet another case that demonstrates an urgent need of public and global health engagement with local stakeholders and ethnographic researchers.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Department of Education
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference33 articles.
1. Lu MC, Jones L, Bond MJ, Wright K, Pumpuang M, Maidenberg M, et al. Where is the F in MCH? Father involvement in African American families. Ethn Dis. 2010;20(12):S2-49–61.
2. Wilson KR, Prior MR. Father involvement and child well-being. J Paediatr Child Health. 2011;47(7):405–7.
3. Cano T, Perales F, Baxter J. A matter of time: father involvement and child cognitive outcomes. J Marriage Fam. 2018;81(1):164–84.
4. Guterman NB, Bellamy JL, Banman A. Promoting father involvement in early home visiting services for vulnerable families: Findings from a pilot study of “Dads matter.” Child Abuse Negl. 2018;76:261–72.
5. Rolle L, Gullotta G, Trombetta T, Curti L, Gerino E, Brustia P, et al. Father involvement and cognitive development in early and middle childhood: a systematic review. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2405.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献