Author:
Li Jialing,Ji Jing,Guo Hua,Wang Feimiao,Fu Yunxing,Hu Rong
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To explore the effect of sequential embryo transfer (ET) on the pregnancy outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycle and the indications of sequential transfer.
Methods
A total of 1440 FET cycles were enrolled in this retrospective study, of which 1080 patients received conventional ET and 360 patients received sequential ET. Further stratified analysis was performed according to the number of previous failed cycles, the number of embryos transferred and the stage of blastocyst (day 5 or 6, denoted D5 or D6) transferred. Comparison of pregnancy rates, implantation rate, miscarriage rate and multiple pregnancy rate among the groups of patients.
Results
The clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate of the sequential ET group were higher than those of the conventional ET group (P < 0.01); however, there was no statistical difference in multiple pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate (P > 0.05). In sequential transfer, the number of transferred embryos (2 or 3) and the stage of transferred blastocysts (D5 or D6) had no effect on clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, multiple pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate (P > 0.05). In patients with three or more previous failure cycles, the sequential ET group showed higher clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate (P > 0.05).
Conclusions
Compared with conventional ET in FET cycle, sequential ET strategy could significantly improve the clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate. In sequential transfer, patients with three embryos transferred don’t have higher pregnancy rate and implantation rate. Besides, sequential transfer is more suitable for patients with repeated implantation failures (RIF), and increase the utilization rate of D6 blastocysts.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Key Research and Development Program of Ningxia
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference39 articles.
1. Mitri F, Nayot D, Casper RF, Bentov Y. Current tools for the optimization of embryo transfer technique for recurrent implantation failure. Minerva Ginecol. 2016;68(4):431–49.
2. Fukui A, Funamizu A, Yokota M, Yamada K, Nakamua R, Fukuhara R, Kimura H, Mizunuma H. Uterine and circulating natural killer cells and their roles in women with recurrent pregnancy loss, implantation failure and preeclampsia. J Reprod Immunol. 2011;90(1):105–10.
3. Simon A, Laufer N. Assessment and treatment of repeated implantation failure (RIF). J Assist Reprod Gen. 2012;29(11):1227–39.
4. Wakuda K, Takakura K, Nakanishi K, Kita N, Shi H, Hirose M, Noda Y. Embryo-dependent induction of embryo receptivity in the mouse endometrium. J Reprod Fertil. 1999;115(2):315–24.
5. Machtinger R, Dor J, Margolin M, Levron J, Baum M, Ferber B, Shulman A, Bider D, Seidman DS. Sequential transfer of day 3 embryos and blastocysts after previous IVF failures despite adequate ovarian response. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13(3):376–9.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献