Author:
Camacho Elizabeth M.,Smyth Rebecca,Danna Valentina Actis,Kimaro Deborah,Kuzenza Flora,Laisser Rose,Mdoe Paschal,Nsemwa Livuka,Shayo Happiness,Lavender Tina
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The stillbirth rate in Tanzania remains high. Greater engagement with antenatal care may help to reduce stillbirths. We investigated which characteristics of antenatal care clinics are preferred by pregnant women in Tanzania.
Methods
We conducted an unlabelled discrete choice experiment (DCE) with think-aloud interviews. Participants were pregnant women, regardless of parity/gestation, from the Mwanza and Manyara regions of Tanzania. We asked participants to choose which of two hypothetical antenatal clinics they would rather attend. Clinics were described in terms of transport mode, cleanliness, comfort, visit content, and staff attitude. Each participant made 12 choices during the experiment, and a purposively selected sub-set simultaneously verbalised the rationale for their choices. We analysed DCE responses using a multinomial logit model adjusted for study region, and think-aloud data using the Framework approach.
Results
We recruited 251 participants split evenly between the 2 geographical regions. Staff attitude was the most important attribute in clinic choice and dominated the think-aloud narratives. Other significant attributes were mode of transport (walking was preferred) and content of clinic visit (preference was stronger with each additional element of care provided). Cleanliness of the clinic was not a significant attribute overall and the think-aloud exercise identified a willingness to trade-off cleanliness and comfort for respectful care.
Conclusion
Women would prefer to attend a clinic with kind staff which they can access easily. This study suggests that exploration of barriers to providing respectful care, and enabling staff to deliver it, are important areas for future investment. The DCE shows us what average preferences are; antenatal care that is aligned with identified preferences should increase uptake and engagement versus care which does not acknowledge them.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference28 articles.
1. Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Waiswa P, Amouzou A, Mathers C, Hogan D, et al. Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030. Lancet. 2016;387(10018):587–603.
2. Hug L, Alexander M, You D, Alkema L, for Child UIG. National, regional, and global levels and trends in neonatal mortality between 1990 and 2017, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(6):e710-20.
3. UNICEF, World Health Organization. Ending preventable newborn and stillbirths by 2030: moving faster towards high-quality universal health coverage in 2020–2025. UNICEF, World Health Organization; 2020.
4. National Bureau of Statistics, Office of Chief Government Statistician. Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey and Malaria Indicator Survey (TDHS-MIS) 2015–16 [Internet]. Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children; 2016. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/publications/publication-fr321-dhs-final-reports.cfm
5. Mgata S, Maluka SO. Factors for late initiation of antenatal care in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):1–9.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献