Does the implementation of revised American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines improve the identification of stillbirths and preterm births in hypertensive pregnancies: a population-based cohort study from South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa
-
Published:2024-06-29
Issue:1
Volume:24
Page:
-
ISSN:1471-2393
-
Container-title:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Author:
Nisar Muhammad Imran,Kabole Ibrahim,Khanam Rasheda,Shahid Shahira,Bakari Bihila Abdalla,Chowdhury Nabidul Haque,Qazi Muhammad Farrukh,Dutta Arup,Rahman Sayedur,Khalid Javairia,Dhingra Usha,Hasan Tarik,Ansari Nadia,Deb Saikat,Mitra Dipak K.,Mehmood Usma,Aftab Fahad,Ahmed Salahuddin,Khan Shahiryar,Ali Said Mohammad,Ahmed Saifuddin,Manu Alexander,Yoshida Sachiyo,Bahl Rajiv,Baqui Abdullah H.,Sazawal Sunil,Jehan Fyezah
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are a significant cause of maternal mortality worldwide. The classification and treatment of hypertension in pregnancy remain debated. We aim to compare the effectiveness of the revised 2017 ACC/AHA blood pressure threshold in predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Methods
We conducted a secondary data analysis of the Alliance for Maternal and Newborn Health Improvement (AMANHI) biorepository study, including 10,001 pregnant women from Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Tanzania. Blood pressure was measured using validated devices at different antenatal care visits. The blood pressure readings were categorized as: normal blood pressure (systolic blood pressure (sBP) < 120 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure (dBP) < 80 mm Hg), elevated blood pressure (sBP 120–129 and dBP < 80), stage 1 hypertension (sBP 130–139 or dBP 80–89, or both), and stage 2 hypertension (sBP ≥ 140 or dBP ≥ 90, or both). We estimated risk ratios for stillbirths and preterm births, as well as diagnostic test properties of both the pre-existing JNC7 (≥ 140/90) and revised ACC/AHA (≥ 130/80) thresholds using normal blood pressure as reference group.
Results
From May 2014 to June 2018, blood pressure readings were available for 9,448 women (2,894 in Bangladesh, 2,303 in Pakistan, and 4,251 in Tanzania). We observed normal blood pressure in 70%, elevated blood pressure in 12.4%, stage 1 hypertension in 15.2%, and stage 2 hypertension in 2.5% of the pregnant women respectively. Out of these, 310 stillbirths and 9,109 live births were recorded, with 887 preterm births. Using the ACC/AHA criteria, the stage 1 hypertension cut-off revealed 15.3% additional hypertension diagnoses as compared to JNC7 criteria. ACC/AHA defined hypertension was significantly associated with stillbirths (RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4, 2.3). The JNC 7 hypertension cut-off of ≥ 140/90 was significantly associated with a higher risk of preterm births (RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2, 2.2) and stillbirths (RR 3.6, 95% CI 2.5, 5.3). Both criteria demonstrated low sensitivities (8.4 for JNC-7 and 28.1 for ACC/AHA) and positive predictive values (11.0 for JNC7 and 5.2 for ACC/AHA) in predicting adverse outcomes.
Conclusion
The ACC/AHA criteria (≥ 130/80) identified additional cases of hypertension but had limited predictive accuracy for stillbirths and preterm births, highlighting the ongoing need for improved criteria in managing pregnancy-related hypertension.
Funder
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference21 articles.
1. Wang W, Xie X, Yuan T, Wang Y, Zhao F, Zhou Z, et al. Epidemiological trends of maternal hypertensive disorders of pregnancy at the global, regional, and national levels: a population-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):364. 2. Kipnis CM, Daly PL, Goodwin ET, Smith DK. Hypertensive conditions: Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. FP Essent. 2022;522:25–33. 3. Rana S, Lemoine E, Granger JP, Karumanchi SA. Preeclampsia: pathophysiology, challenges, and perspectives. Circ Res. 2019;124(7):1094–112. 4. Madazli R, Yuksel MA, Imamoglu M, Tuten A, Oncul M, Aydin B, et al. Comparison of clinical and perinatal outcomes in early-and late-onset preeclampsia. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;290:53–7. 5. Haddad B, Deis S, Goffinet F, Paniel BJ, Cabrol D, Sibaı̈ BM. Maternal and perinatal outcomes during expectant management of 239 severe preeclamptic women between 24 and 33 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(6):1590–5.
|
|