Author:
Vanneaux Manon,Forey Pierre-Louis,Equy Véronique,Hoffmann Pascale,Riethmuller Didier
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Induction of labour, a very common obstetric procedure, affects about one in five pregnant women in most developed countries. Induction of labour is medically indicated, is subject to risks and additional costs, and is often poorly experienced by patients. The practices concerning induction vary widely from centre to centre and therefore need to be evaluated. Our aim was to develop a tool for evaluating induction of labour which would facilitate geographical and temporal comparisons.
Methods
We have created a classification based on the principles of the internationally known Robson classification. It should be simple, robust, reproducible and require readily available data in each file. The groups are fully inclusive and mutually exclusive. This classification has been validated by a Delphi method.
Results
Our classification includes 8 clinically relevant groups according to 5 obstetrical criteria. In order to classify each patient into a group, a simple system based on a maximum of 7 successive questions (from 1 to 7 questions) is used. Our classification has been validated by 13 national experts with satisfactory overall approval.
Conclusions
With a view to improving the quality of care, our Grenoble classification would allow a standardization of the evaluation of practices of the induction of labour over time in the same maternity hospital. It would also allow the comparison of practices within different maternity hospitals in a network, a country or even different countries.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference10 articles.
1. Nippita TA, Khambalia AZ, Seeho SK, Trevena JA, Patterson JA, Ford JB, et al. Methods of classification for women undergoing induction of labour: a systematic review and novel classification system. BJOG. 2015;122(10):1284–93.
2. Robson MS. Classification of caesarean sections. Fetal Matern Med Rev. 2001;12(1):23–39.
3. Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32(4):1008–15.
4. Goffinet F, Dreyfus M, Carbonne B, Magnin G, Cabrol D. Enquête des pratiques de maturation du col et de déclenchement du travail en France. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2003;32(7):638–46.
5. Blanc-Petitjean P, Salomé M, Dupont C, Crenn-Hebert C, Gaudineau A, Perrotte F, et al. Labour induction practices in France: a population-based declarative survey in 94 maternity units. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018;47(2):57–62.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献