Navigating geographical disparities: access to obstetric hospitals in maternity care deserts and across the United States

Author:

Fontenot Jazmin,Brigance Christina,Lucas Ripley,Stoneburner Ashley

Abstract

Abstract Background Access to maternity care in the U.S. remains inequitable, impacting over two million women in maternity care “deserts." Living in these areas, exacerbated by hospital closures and workforce shortages, heightens the risks of pregnancy-related complications, particularly in rural regions. This study investigates travel distances and time to obstetric hospitals, emphasizing disparities faced by those in maternity care deserts and rural areas, while also exploring variances across races and ethnicities. Methods The research adopted a retrospective secondary data analysis, utilizing the American Hospital Association and Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Provider of Services Files to classify obstetric hospitals. The study population included census tract estimates of birthing individuals sourced from the U.S. Census Bureau's 2017-2021 American Community Survey. Using ArcGIS Pro Network Analyst, drive time and distance calculations to the nearest obstetric hospital were conducted. Furthermore, Hot Spot Analysis was employed to identify areas displaying significant spatial clusters of high and low travel distances. Results The mean travel distance and time to the nearest obstetric facility was 8.3 miles and 14.1 minutes. The mean travel distance for maternity care deserts and rural counties was 28.1 and 17.3 miles, respectively. While birthing people living in rural maternity care deserts had the highest average travel distance overall (33.4 miles), those living in urban maternity care deserts also experienced inequities in travel distance (25.0 miles). States with hotspots indicating significantly higher travel distances included: Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Nebraska. Census tracts where the predominant race is American Indian/Alaska Native (AIAN) had the highest travel distance and time compared to those of all other predominant races/ethnicities. Conclusions Our study revealed significant disparities in obstetric hospital access, especially affecting birthing individuals in maternity care deserts, rural counties, and communities predominantly composed of AIAN individuals, resulting in extended travel distances and times. To rectify these inequities, sustained investment in the obstetric workforce and implementation of innovative programs are imperative, specifically targeting improved access in maternity care deserts as a priority area within healthcare policy and practice.

Funder

Elevance Health Foundation

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference63 articles.

1. Declercq E, Zephyrin LC. Severe Maternal Morbidity in the United States: A Primer. Commonwealth Fund. 2021. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2021/oct/severe-maternal-morbidity-united-states-primer. Accessed 31 Mar 2024.

2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Four in 5 pregnancy-related deaths in the U.S. are preventable. https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2022/p0919-pregnancy-related-deaths.html (accessed 14 Dec. 2023).

3. Backes EP, Scrimshaw S, National Academies of Sciences E and M. Birth settings in America: outcomes, quality, access, and choice. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2020.

4. Eliason EL, Daw JR, Allen HL. Association of Medicaid vs Marketplace Eligibility on Maternal Coverage and Access with Prenatal and Postpartum Care. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.37383.

5. Brigance C, Lucas R, Jones E, Davis A, Oinuma M, Mishkin K, et al. Nowhere to Go: Maternity Care Deserts Across the U.S. (Report No. 3). 2022. https://www.marchofdimes.org/sites/default/files/2022-10/2022_Maternity_Care_Report.pdf.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3