Author:
Svelato Alessandro,Carabaneanu Alis,Sergiampietri Claudia,Mannella Paolo,D’Avino Sara,De Luca Caterina,Bartolone Martina,Angioli Roberto,Ragusa Antonio
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Since operative vaginal delivery may be risky for women and might cause neonatal complications, the aim of this study is to assess appropriateness of the procedure.
This is a prospective, longitudinal, multicenter, observational study and it was conducted in three Italian Obstetric Units (Pisa, Massa Carrara and Prato). All term pregnant women, either nulliparous and multiparous, with singleton pregnancy and a cephalic fetus, with spontaneous or induced labour, requiring vacuum-assisted delivery were enrolled.
Indications to operative vaginal delivery were grouped as alterations of fetal cardiotocography (CTG) patterns, delay/arrest of second stage of labour or elective shortening of second stage of labour. A board consisting of five among authors evaluated appropriateness of the procedure.
Results
Overall, 466 women undergoing operative vaginal deliveries were included. Cardiotocography, classified as ACOG category 2 or 3 was the indication for vacuum assisted delivery in 253 patients (54.29%). Among these, 66 women (26.1%) had an operative vaginal delivery which was then considered to be inappropriate, while in 114 cases (45.1%) CTG traces resulted to be unreadable.
Conclusion
Decision making process, which leads clinicians to go for operative vaginal delivery, is often influenced by shortness of time and complexity of the situation. Therefore, clinicians tend to intervene performing vacuum delivery without adopting critical analysis and without adequately considering the clinical situation.
Tweetable abstract
Operative vaginal delivery might be a risky procedure and should be performed only when clinically indicated and after adequate critical analysis.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference25 articles.
1. Fitch K, editor. The Rand/UCLA appropriateness method user’s manual. Santa Monica: Rand; 2001. 109 p.
2. Svelato A, Ragusa A, Manfredi P. General methods for measuring and comparing medical interventions in childbirth: a framework. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth . 2020 Dec;20(1). Available from: https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-02945-5.Cited 2020 May 8
3. Ragusa A, Gizzo S, Noventa M, Ferrazzi E, Deiana S, Svelato A. Prevention of primary caesarean delivery: comprehensive management of dystocia in nulliparous patients at term. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294(4):753–61.
4. Croskerry P. The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them: academic medicine. 2003;78(8):775–80.
5. Hutchinson M, Hurley J, Kozlowski D, Whitehair L. The use of emotional intelligence capabilities in clinical reasoning and decision-making: a qualitative, exploratory study. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(3–4):e600–10.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献