Author:
Winters Solis,Pitchik Helen O.,Akter Fahmida,Yeasmin Farzana,Jahir Tania,Huda Tarique Md. Nurul,Rahman Mahbubur,Winch Peter J.,Luby Stephen P.,Fernald Lia C. H.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
In South Asia, roughly half of women attend at least four antenatal care visits with skilled health personnel, the minimum number recommended by the World Health Organization for optimal birth outcomes. A much greater proportion of women attend at least one antenatal care visit, suggesting that a key challenge is ensuring that women initiate antenatal care early in pregnancy and continue to attend after their first visit. One critical barrier to antenatal care attendance may be that women do not have sufficient power in their relationships, households, or communities to attend antenatal care when they want to. The main goals of this paper were to 1) understand the potential effects of intervening on direct measures of women’s empowerment—including household decision making, freedom of movement, and control over assets—on antenatal care attendance in a rural population of women in Bangladesh, and 2) examine whether differential associations exist across strata of socioeconomic status.
Methods
We analyzed data on 1609 mothers with children under 24 months old in rural Bangladesh and employed targeted maximum likelihood estimation with ensemble machine learning to estimate population average treatment effects.
Results
Greater women’s empowerment was associated with an increased number of antenatal care visits. Specifically, among women who attended at least one antenatal care visit, having high empowerment was associated with a greater probability of ≥ 4 antenatal care visits, both in comparison to low empowerment (15.2 pp, 95% CI: 6.0, 24.4) and medium empowerment (9.1 pp, 95% CI: 2.5, 15.7). The subscales of women’s empowerment driving the associations were women’s decision-making power and control over assets. We found that greater women’s empowerment is associated with more antenatal care visits regardless of socioeconomic status.
Conclusions
Empowerment-based interventions, particularly those targeting women’s involvement in household decisions and/or facilitating greater control over assets, may be a valuable strategy for increasing antenatal care attendance.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04111016, Date First Registered: 01/10/2019.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference57 articles.
1. World Health Organization. Newborns: improving survival and well-being [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Jan 26]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/newborns-reducing-mortality
2. World Health Organization. Preterm birth [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2022 Jan 26]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/preterm-birth
3. Kuhnt J, Vollmer S. Antenatal care services and its implications for vital and health outcomes of children: evidence from 193 surveys in 69 low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Open. 2017;7(11): e017122.
4. Dowswell T, Carroli G, Duley L, Gates S, Gülmezoglu AM, Khan-Neelofur D, et al. Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 2015(7):CD000934.
5. Tunçalp Ӧ, Pena-Rosas J, Lawrie T, Bucagu M, Oladapo O, Portela A, et al. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience—going beyond survival. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;124(6):860–2.