Factors associated with the intention of pregnant women to give birth with epidural analgesia: a cross-sectional study

Author:

Van Leugenhaege LukaORCID,Degraeve JulieORCID,Jacquemyn YvesORCID,Mestdagh EvelineORCID,Kuipers Yvonne J.ORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background In Belgium most women receive epidural analgesia during labour. Although, it offers satisfactory pain relief during labour, the risk on a series of adverse advents has been reported. The objective of this study was to determine factors associated with the intention of pregnant women, anticipating a vaginal birth, of requesting epidural analgesia during labour. Methods A cross-sectional study, using an online self-report questionnaire was performed, including socio-demographic and personal details. Associated factors were examined with the HEXACO-60 questionnaire, the Mental Health Inventory-5, the Tilburg Pregnancy Distress Scale and the Labour Pain Relief Attitude Questionnaire for pregnant women. The level of intention to request epidural analgesia was based on two questions: Do you intend to ask for epidural analgesia (1) at the start of your labour; (2) at some point during labour? Data were collected predominantly during the second and third trimester of pregnancy. Descriptive analysis and a multiple linear regression analysis were performed. Results 949 nulliparous (45.9%) and multiparous (54.1%) pregnant women, living in Flanders (Dutch-speaking part of Belgium) anticipating a vaginal birth completed the questionnaires. Birth-related anxiety (ß 0.096, p < 0.001), the attitude that because of the impact of pregnancy on the body, asking for pain relief is normal (ß 0.397, p < 0.001) and feeling more self-confident during labour when having pain relief (ß 0.034, p < 0.001) show a significant positive relationship with the intention for intrapartum epidural analgesia. The length of the gestational period (ß − 0.056, p 0.015), having a midwife as the primary care giver during pregnancy (ß − 0.048, p 0.044), and considering the partner in decision-making about pain relief (ß − 0.112, p < 0.001) show a significant negative relationship with the intention level of epidural analgesia. The explained variability by the multiple regression model is 54%. Conclusions A discussion during pregnancy about the underlying reason for epidural analgesia allows maternity care providers and partners to support women with pain management that is in line with women’s preferences. Because women’s intentions vary during the gestational period, pain relief should be an issue of conversation throughout pregnancy.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Reference37 articles.

1. Seijmonsbergen-Schermers AE, Akker T, van den, Rydahl E, Beeckman K, Bogaerts A, Binfa L, et al. Variations in use of childbirth interventions in 13 high-income countries: a multinational cross-sectional study. PLOS Med. 2020;17(5):e1003103.

2. Harkins J, Carvalho B, Evers A, Mehta S, Riley ET. Survey of the factors Associated with a woman’s choice to have an Epidural for Labor Analgesia. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2010;2010:1–8.

3. Leroy C, Van Leeuw V. Santé périnatal en wallonie - Année 2021. Brussel: Centre d’Épidémiologie Périnatale; 2022.

4. Goemaes R, Fomenko E, Laubach M, De Coen K, Roelens K, Bogaerts A. Perinatale gezondheid in Vlaanderen - jaar 2021. Brussel: Studiecentrum voor Perinatale Epidemiologie; 2022.

5. Van Leeuw V, Leroy C. Perinatale gezondheid in het Brussels Gewest – Jaar 2021. Brussel: Centre d’épidémiologie périnatale; 2022.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3