Author:
Espinosa Maite,Artieta-Pinedo Isabel,Paz-Pascual Carmen,Bully-Garay Paola,García-Álvarez Arturo,Estalella Itziar,Trincado Mª José,Cabeza Inés,Gagnon Mari Pierre,Fernández Ana,Lozano Gorane,Villanueva Gemma,Sánchez Jesús,Maquibar Amaia,Moreno David,Legarra Catalina,Mulas Maria Jesús,Blas Mónica,Amorrortu Pilar,Alva Sonia,
Abstract
AbstractThe dominant model of childbirth in most Western countries is medicalized childbirth. Women's beliefs about whether childbirth should be a medicalized process to a greater or lesser degree may be related, in addition to contextual factors, to internal factors. The objective of the study is to find out if women’s locus of control (LC) and stress coping strategies (CS) are related to having a more favourable or less favourable attitude towards medicalization (ATMC). A cross-sectional study was carried out with the participation of 248 women recruited in primary care centres by their midwives. All the women filled in answers on a mobile phone app with various different measurement instruments: the questionnaire created by Benyamini to evaluate their ATMC; the Spanish version of the Wallston MLC to evaluate their LC; and the Spanish adaptation of the “Revised Prenatal Coping Inventory (NuPCI)” scale for the assessment of their CS. The women presented a favourable attitude towards medicalization, with a mean ATMC score of 3.42. Both the LC and the CS of women during pregnancy are related to this attitude. Specifically, having an internal LC and using preparative CS both lower the probability of presenting a favourable attitude towards medicalization, while the lack of a paid job raises the probability. For each point in internal locus and preparatory coping, the ATMC score decreased by 0.02 and 0.23 points, respectively, while it increased by 0.18 for not having a paid job. The influence of these psychological factors must be taken into account in the development of content and interventions that promote a more natural birth.
Funder
Institute of Health Carlos III
Basque Government Department of Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference47 articles.
1. Benyamini Y, Molcho ML, Dan U, Gozlan M, Preis H. Women’s attitudes towards the medicalization of childbirth and their associations with planned and actual modes of birth. Women Birth. 2017;30(5):424–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2017.03.007 Epub 2017 Apr 20 PMID: 28434672.
2. Ministerio de Sanidad. Atención perinatal en España: Análisis de los recursos físicos, humanos, actividad y calidad de los servicios hospitalarios, 2010-2018 [Publicación en Internet. Ultimo acceso Abril 2022]. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad; 2021. NIPO en línea: 133-21-017-X. https://cpage.mpr.gob.es/.
3. Hammer RP, Burton-Jeangros C. Tensions around risks in pregnancy: a typology of women’s experiences of surveillance medicine. Soc Sci Med. 2013;93:55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.033 Epub 2013 Jun 19 PMID: 23906121.
4. Jansen L, Gibson M, Bowles BC, Leach J. First do no harm: interventions during childbirth. J Perinat Educ. 2013;22(2):83–92. https://doi.org/10.1891/1058-1243.22.2.83.
5. Foucault M. El nacimiento de la clínica: una arqueología de la mirada médica. Siglo XXI de España Editores, S.A.; Presses Universitariesde France edición (15 diciembre 1999). ISBN-10 843231014X.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献