Author:
Martin Elizabeth,Ayoub Bassel,Miller Yvette D.
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
In this systematic review, we aimed to identify the full extent of cost-effectiveness evidence available for evaluating alternative Maternity Models of Care (MMC) and to summarize findings narratively.
Methods
Articles that included a decision tree or state-based (Markov) model to explore the cost-effectiveness of an MMC, and at least one comparator MMC, were identified from a systematic literature review. The MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and Google Scholar databases were searched for papers published in English, Arabic, and French. A narrative synthesis was conducted to analyse results.
Results
Three studies were included; all using cost-effectiveness decision tree models with data sourced from a combination of trials, databases, and the literature. Study quality was fair to poor. Each study compared midwife-led or doula-assisted care to obstetrician- or physician-led care. The findings from these studies indicate that midwife and doula led MMCs may provide value.
Conclusion
The findings of these studies indicate weak evidence that midwife and doula models of care may be a cost-effective or cost-saving alternative to standard care. However, the poor quality of evidence, lack of standardised MMC classifications, and the dearth of research conducted in this area are barriers to conclusive evaluation and highlight the need for more research incorporating appropriate models and population diversity.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference46 articles.
1. World Health Organization. The Network for Improving Quality of Care for Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health. Evolution, implementation, and progress: 2017–2020 Report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.
2. Grigg CP, Tracy SK. New Zealand's unique maternity system. Women Birth. 2013;26:e59–64.
3. Davarki K. Access to maternal health and midwifery for vulnerable groups in the EU. European Parliament's Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality; 2019.
4. Donnolley N, Butler-Henderson K, Chapman M, Sullivan E. The development of a classification system for maternity models of care. Health Inf Manag. 2016;45:64–70.
5. Talukdar S, Dingle K, Miller YD. A scoping review of evidence comparing models of maternity care in Australia. Midwifery. 2021;99:102973.