Design of the Pregnancy REmote MOnitoring II study (PREMOM II): a multicenter, randomized controlled trial of remote monitoring for gestational hypertensive disorders

Author:

Lanssens DorienORCID,Thijs Inge M.,Gyselaers Wilfried,Gyselaers Wilfried,Thijs Inge M.,Lanssens Dorien,De Jonge Eric T.,Van Holsbeke Caroline,Mesens Tinne,Jacquemyn Yves,Mannaerts Dominique,Devlieger Roland,Van Calsteren Kristel,Logghe Hilde,Lebbe Barbara,

Abstract

Abstract Background Observational data from the retrospective, non-randomized Pregnancy REmote MOnitoring I (PREMOM I) study showed that remote monitoring (RM) may be beneficial for prenatal observation of women at risk for gestational hypertensive disorders (GHD) in terms of clinical outcomes, health economics, and stakeholder perceptions. PREMOM II is a prospective, randomized, multicenter follow-up study that was performed to explore these promising results. Methods After providing written consent, 3922 pregnant women aged ≥18 years who are at increased risk of developing GHD will be randomized (1:1:1 ratio) to (a) conventional care (control group), (b) a patient self-monitoring group, and (c) a midwife-assisted RM group. The women in each group will be further divided (1:1 ratio) to evaluate the outcomes of targeted or non-targeted (conventional) antihypertensive medication. Women will be recruited in five hospitals in Flanders, Belgium: Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Universitaire Ziekenhuis Antwerpen, Universitaire Ziekenhuis Leuven, AZ Sint Jan Brugge–Oostende, and AZ Sint Lucas Brugge. The primary outcomes are: (1) numbers and types of prenatal visits; (2) maternal outcomes; (3) neonatal outcomes; (4) the applicability and performance of RM; and (5) compliance with RM and self-monitoring. The secondary outcomes are: (1) cost-effectiveness and willingness to pay; (2) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) questionnaires on the experiences of the participants; and (3) the maternal and perinatal outcomes according to the type of antihypertensive medication. Demographic, and maternal and neonatal outcomes are collected from the patients’ electronic records. Blood pressure and compliance rate will be obtained from an online digital coordination platform for remote data handling. Information about the healthcare-related costs will be obtained from the National Coordination Committee of Belgian Health Insurance Companies (Intermutualistisch Agentschap). PROMS will be assessed using validated questionnaires. Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first randomized trial comparing midwife-assisted RM and self-monitoring of prenatal blood pressure versus conventional management among women at increased risk of GHD. Positive results of this study may lead to a practical framework for caregivers, hospital management, and payers to introduce RM into the prenatal care programs of high-risk pregnancies. Trial registration This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov, identification number NCT04031430. Registered 24 July 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04031430?cond=premom+ii&draw=2&rank=1.

Funder

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Reference41 articles.

1. Devlieger R, Martens E, Martens G, Van Mol C, Cammu H. Perinatale activiteiten in Vlaanderen 2015. Brussel: SPE; 2016.

2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Hypertension in pregnancy. 2020. http://www.acog.org/Resources-And-Publications/TaskForce-and-Work-Group-Reports/Hypertension-in-Pregnancy. Accessed 22 July 2020.

3. Abalos E, Duley L, Steyn DW. Antihypertensive drug therapy for mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2:CD002252.

4. Ankumah NA, Cantu J, Jauk V, Biggio J, Hauth J, Anders W, et al. Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with mild chronic hypertension before 20 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(5):966–72.

5. Magee LA, Duley L. Oral beta-blockers for mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;3:CD002863.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3