Author:
Kitaw Tebabere Moltot,Limenh Simachew Kassa,Chekole Fantahun Alemnew,Getie Simegnew Asmer,Gemeda Belete Negese,Engda Abayneh Shewangzaw
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Emergency cesarean section is a commonly performed surgical procedure in pregnant women with life-threatening conditions of the mother and/or fetus. According to the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, decision to delivery interval for emergency cesarean sections should be within 30 min. It is an indicator of quality of care in maternity service, and if prolonged, it constitutes a third-degree delay. This study aimed to assess the decision to delivery interval and associated factors for emergency cesarean section in Bahir Dar City Public Hospitals, Ethiopia.
Method
An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted at Bahir Dar City Public Hospitals from February to May 2020. Study participants were selected using a systematic random sampling technique. A combination of observations and interviews was used to collect the data. Data entry and analysis were performed using Epi-data version 3.1 and SPSS version 25, respectively. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Result
Decision-to-delivery interval below 30 min was observed in 20.3% [95% CI = 15.90–24.70%] of emergency cesarean section. The results showed that referral status [AOR = 2.5, 95% CI = 1.26–5.00], time of day of emergency cesarean section [AOR = 2.5, 95%CI = 1.26–4.92], status of surgeons [AOR = 2.95, 95%CI = 1.30–6.70], type of anesthesia [AOR = 4, 95% CI = 1.60–10.00] and transfer time [AOR = 5.26, 95% CI = 2.65–10.46] were factors significantly associated with the decision to delivery interval.
Conclusion
Decision-to-delivery intervals were not achieved within the recommended time interval. Therefore, to address institutional delays in emergency cesarean section, providers and facilities should be better prepared in advance and ready for rapid emergency action.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Reference29 articles.
1. Soltanifar S, Russell R. The National Institute for health and clinical excellence (NICE) guidelines for caesarean section, 2011 update: implications for the anaesthetist. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012;21(3):264–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.03.004.
2. Gholitabar M, Ullman R, James D, Griffiths M. Caesarean section: summary of updated NICE guidance. BMJ. 2011;343(nov23 1):d7108. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7108.
3. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Spong CY, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, Casey BM, Sheffield JS. Williams obstetrics 24 edition. 24th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education eBooks New York; 2014.
4. Obstetricians ACo, Safety GCoP. Improvement Q: ACOG Committee Opinion No. 487: preparing for clinical emergencies in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(4):1032–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821922eb.
5. Organization WH. WHO recommendations non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections: World Health Organization; 2018.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献