Author:
Marshall Emily Gard,Horrey Kathleen,Moritz Lauren R.,Buote Richard,Grudniewicz Agnes,Goldsmith Laurie J.,Randall Ellen,Jones Lori,Lavergne M Ruth
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Many family medicine residency graduates indicate a desire to provide obstetric care, but a low proportion of family physicians (FPs) provide obstetric care within their practice. This suggests personal preference alone may not account for the low proportion of FPs who ultimately provide full obstetric care. If decisionmakers plan to augment the number of FPs providing obstetric care, barriers to the provision of such care must first be identified. Within this paper, we explore the perspectives of both family practice residents and early-career FPs on the factors that shaped their decision to provide obstetric care.
Methods
In this qualitative study, we analyzed a subset of interview data from three Canadian provinces: British Columbia, Ontario, and Nova Scotia (n = 18 family practice residents; n = 39 early-career FPs). We used thematic analysis to analyze data relevant to obstetric care practice, applying the socio-ecological model and comparing themes across participant types, gender, and province.
Results
Participants described influences affecting their decision about providing obstetric care. Key influencing factors aligned with the levels of the socio-ecological model of public policy (i.e., liability), community (i.e., community needs), organizational (e.g., obstetric care trade-offs, working in teams, sufficient exposure in training), interpersonal practice preferences (i.e., impact on family life, negative interactions with other healthcare professionals), and individual factors (i.e., defining comprehensive care as “everything but obstetrics”). Many participants were interested in providing obstetric care within their practice but did not provide such care. Participants’ decision-making around providing or not providing obstetric care included considerations of personal preferences and outside influences.
Conclusions
Individual-level factors alone do not account for the decrease in the type and amount of obstetric care offered by FPs. Instead, FPs’ choice to provide or not provide obstetric care is influenced by factors at higher levels of the socio-ecological model. Policymakers who want to encourage obstetric practice by FPs should implement interventions at the public policy, community, organizational, interpersonal, and individual levels.
Funder
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference25 articles.
1. Hansen ER, Eden AR, Peterson LE. A qualitative study of trainee experiences in family medicine-obstetrics fellowships. Birth. 2019;46(1):90–6.
2. Hedden L, Munro S, McGrail KM, Law MR, Bourgeault IL, Barer ML. Is attending birth dying out?: trends in obstetric care provision among primary care physicians in British Columbia. Can Fam Physician. 2019;65(12):901–9.
3. Bédard MJ, Berthiaume S, Beaulieu MD, Leclerc C. Factors influencing the decision to practise obstetrics among Québec medical students: a survey. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006;28(12):1075–82.
4. Pinto M, Rochat R, Hennink M, Zertuche AD, Spelke B. Bridging the gaps in obstetric care: perspectives of service delivery providers on challenges and core components of care in rural Georgia. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20(7):1349–57.
5. Koppula S, Brown JB, Jordan JM. Teaching primary care obstetrics: insights and recruitment recommendations from family physicians. Can Fam Physician. 2014;60(3):e180–6.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献