Abstract
Abstract
Background
Disrespect and Abuse (D&A) during childbirth represents an important barrier to skilled birth utilization, indicating a problem with quality of care and a violation of women‘s human rights. This study compared prevalence of D&A during childbirth in a public and a private hospital in Southeast Nigeria.
Methods
This study was a cross-sectional study among women who gave birth in two specialized health facilities: a public teaching and a private-for-profit faith-based hospital in Southeast Nigeria. In each facility, systematic random sampling was used to select 310 mothers who had given birth in the facility and were between 0-14 weeks after birth. Study participants were recruited through the immunization clinics. Semi-structured, interviewer-administered questionnaires using the Bowser and Hills classification of D&A during childbirth were used for data collection. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20 at 95% significance level.
Results
Mean age of the participants in the public hospital was 30.41 ± 4.4 and 29.31 ± 4.4 in the private hospital. Over three-fifths (191; 61.6%) in the public and 156 women (50.3%) in the private hospital had experienced at least one form of D&A during childbirth [cOR1.58; 95% CI 1.15, 2.18]. Abandonment and neglect [Public153 (49.4%) vs. Private: 91 (29.4%); cOR2.35; 95% CI. 1.69, 3.26] and non-consented care [Public 45 (14.5%) vs. Private 67(21.6%): cOR0.62; 95% CI. 0.41, 0.93] were the major types of D&A during childbirth. Denial of companionship was the most reported subtype of D&A during childbirth in both facilities [Public 135 (43.5%) vs. Private66 (21.3%); cOR2.85; 95% CI. 2.00, 4.06]. Rural residents were less likely to report at least one form of D&A during childbirth (aOR 0.53; CI 0.35-0.79).
Conclusion
Although prevalence was high in both facilities, overall prevalence of D&A during childbirth and most subtypes were higher in the public health facility. There is a need to identify contextual factors enabling D&A during childbirth in public and private health care settings.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference53 articles.
1. White Ribbon Alliance. Respectful maternity care: The universal rights of childbearing women, www.whiteribbonalliance.org/respectfulcare (2010, accessed 12 August 2017).
2. World Health Organization. The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth:WHO statement. Geneva, Switzerland, http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/134588/1/WHO_RHR_14.23_eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1 (2014, accessed 9 February 2017).
3. Tunçalp Ӧ, Were W, MacLennan C, et al. Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns-the WHO vision.BJOG. 2015;122:1045–9.
4. World Health Organization. Standards for improving quality of maternal and newborn care in health facilities. Geneva, http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/improving-maternal-newborn-care-quality/en/ (2017, accessed 13 September 2017).
5. Miller S, Lalonde A. The global epidemic of abuse and disrespect during childbirth : History , evidence , interventions , and FIGO ’ s mother − baby friendly birthing facilities initiative. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;131:S49–52.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献