First trimester antenatal care contact in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and contributing factors

Author:

Abdo Ritbano,Demelash Minychil,Seid Abdulrezak Mohammed,Mussema Abdulhakim

Abstract

Abstract Background Early detection, prevention, and management of diseases associated with pregnancy and pregnancy-related conditions depend on the beginning of antenatal care contact in the first trimester. Across Africa, regional and national differences are observed in the proportion of first-trimester ANC contact and the factors contributing to it. To create a suitable intervention plan, it is crucial to overcome these differences through single standard and uniform guidelines. This can be achieved through meta-analysis and systematic reviews. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to assess the pooled prevalence of first trimester ANC contact and the factors contributing to it in Africa. Methods Observational studies conducted in Africa were retrieved from PubMed, Google Scholar, EMASE, CINHAL, Cochrane Library, Hinari databases and Mednar using combinations of search terms with Boolean operators. The JBI 2020 Critical Appraisal Checklist was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. To assess publication bias, a funnel plot and Egger’s test were used to and I-squared was used to check the heterogeneity of the included studies. Data were extracted using Microsoft Excel and exported to Stata 16 software for analysis. Results A total of 86 articles with 224,317 study participants from 19 African countries were included. The overall pooled prevalence of first-trimester ANC contact was 37.15% (95% CI: 33.3–41.0; I2 = 99.8%). The following factors were found to be significantly associated with first-trimester ANC contact: urban residence (OR = 2.2; 95% CI: 1.5–3.1; I2 = 98.5%); women under the age of 25 (OR = 1.5; 95% CI: 1.2–1.9; I2 = 94.1%);, educational status (OR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.4–2.2; I2 = 96.1%), primiparity (OR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.2–2.4: I2 = 97.4%), having planned pregnancies (OR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.5–2.7; I2 = 95.5%) and employed women (OR = 1.7; 95% CI: 1.7–2.1; I2 = 94.4%). Conclusion Because so few women in Africa initiate first-trimester ANC contact, it is clear that increasing maternal healthcare service uptake is still a challenge and will require significant effort to scale up the services. When working to improve maternal health in Africa, each nation's government and nongovernmental organizations should prioritize raising women's educational levels and providing pertinent information to rural women, focusing on reducing unintended pregnancies, women who live far from health facilities, women with low socioeconomic statuses, multiparous women and older women. Trial registration PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic reviews (ID: CRD42023401711).

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Reference140 articles.

1. WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and UNDESA/Population DivisionTrends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2020: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and UNDESA/Population Division. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240068759.

2. Sub-Saharan Africa suffers top maternal deaths globally. Available from: https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202302/24/WS63f8c4a8a31057c47ebb0c6f.html.

3. Suzuki E, Nkouame C, Mills S. Progress in reducing maternal mortality has stagnated and we are not on track to achieve the SDG target: new UN report. Available from: https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/progress-reducing-maternal-mortality-has-stagnated-and-we-are-not-track-achieve-sdg-target.

4. Van den Broek N. Keep it simple - Effective training in obstetrics for low- and middle-income countries. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;80:25–38.

5. Tunçalp Ӧ, Pena-Rosas JP, Lawrie T, Bucagu M, Oladapo OT, Portela A, et al. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience-going beyond survival. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;124(6):860–2.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3