Author:
Hassan Amier,Critelli Brian,Lahooti Ila,Lahooti Ali,Matzko Nate,Adams Jan Niklas,Liss Lukas,Quion Justin,Restrepo David,Nikahd Melica,Culp Stacey,Noh Lydia,Tong Kathleen,Park Jun Sung,Akshintala Venkata,Windsor John A.,Mull Nikhil K.,Papachristou Georgios I.,Celi Leo Anthony,Lee Peter J.
Abstract
AbstractAcute pancreatitis (AP) is an acute inflammatory disorder that is common, costly, and is increasing in incidence worldwide with over 300,000 hospitalizations occurring yearly in the United States alone. As its course and outcomes vary widely, a critical knowledge gap in the field has been a lack of accurate prognostic tools to forecast AP patients’ outcomes. Despite several published studies in the last three decades, the predictive performance of published prognostic models has been found to be suboptimal. Recently, non-regression machine learning models (ML) have garnered intense interest in medicine for their potential for better predictive performance. Each year, an increasing number of AP models are being published. However, their methodologic quality relating to transparent reporting and risk of bias in study design has never been systematically appraised. Therefore, through collaboration between a group of clinicians and data scientists with appropriate content expertise, we will perform a systematic review of papers published between January 2021 and December 2023 containing artificial intelligence prognostic models in AP. To systematically assess these studies, the authors will leverage the CHARMS checklist, PROBAST tool for risk of bias assessment, and the most current version of the TRIPOD-AI. (Research Registry (http://www.reviewregistry1727.).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献