Practical and analytical considerations when performing interim analyses in diagnostic test accuracy studies

Author:

Fleming SusannahORCID,Mwandigha Lazaro,Fanshawe Thomas R.

Abstract

AbstractInterim analysis is a common methodology in randomised clinical trials but has received less attention in studies of diagnostic test accuracy. In such studies, early termination for futility may be beneficial if early evidence indicates that a diagnostic test is unlikely to achieve a clinically useful level of diagnostic performance, as measured by the sensitivity and specificity. In this paper, we describe relevant practical and analytical considerations when planning and performing interim analysis in diagnostic accuracy studies, focusing on stopping rules for futility. We present an adaptation of the exact group sequential method for diagnostic testing, with R code provided for implementing this method in practice. The method is illustrated using two simulated data sets and data from a published diagnostic accuracy study for point-of-care testing for SARS-CoV-2. The considerations described in this paper can be used to guide decisions as to when an interim analysis in a diagnostic accuracy study is suitable and highlight areas for further methodological development.

Funder

National Institute for Health and Care Research

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference37 articles.

1. Thompson M, Van den Bruel A. Diagnostic tests toolkit. BMJ Books; 2012.

2. Zhou XH, Obuchowski NA, McClish DK. 3: design of diagnostic accuracy studies. In: Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine. Wiley; 2011.

3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Early Value Assessment (EVA) for medtech. 2023. https://www.nice.org.uk/about/what-we-do/eva-for-medtech. Accessed 13 Nov 2023.

4. Gerke O, Høilund-Carlsen PF, Poulsen MH, Vach W. Interim analyses in diagnostic versus treatment studies: differences and similarities. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;2:344–52.

5. Zapf A, Stark M, Gerke O, Ehret C, Benda N, Bossuyt P, et al. Adaptive trial designs in diagnostic accuracy research. Stat Med. 2019;39:591–601.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3