Users’ perceptions of how an unmoderated eating disorder community may benefit or harm their recovery

Author:

Jones Maegan E.,Salafia Elizabeth H. Blodgett,Leonard Kerrie C.

Abstract

Abstract Background While the negative and positive outcomes of pro-eating disorder groups have been well-documented, more research is needed on the effects of pro-recovery communities. In particular, a gap in knowledge remains surrounding users’ feelings about their experiences in such communities. Using open-ended questions, we surveyed those involved in the recovery community on the social media site Tumblr, to determine how the community helped/did not help with recovery, and how it made them feel about recovery. Methods Participants (n = 29) answered a series of Likert and open-ended questions. The open-ended questions were examined using thematic analysis to learn about users’ lived experiences. Results Themes identified included connection/acceptance, motivation/encouragement, content, and competition/comparisons. Participants overall felt that the community helped them feel connected to others and accepted for their struggles and their successes, though a minority did note that such acceptance could sometimes reinforce negative behaviors, and connection could lead to pressure to help others. Participants found both direct advice and indirect support (e.g., encouraging posts) to be motivating for their recovery. Feelings of competition and comparison were mixed; some felt that comparing to others made them feel less than, while others used such comparisons as reminders to stay strong in recovery. Participants indicated that the content within the community varies; sometimes there is a large presence of pro eating disorder posts, while at other times, posts are more positive, motivational, and encouraging. Conclusions Participants overall indicated that the community had many helpful aspects and made them feel better about recovery. However, the presence of triggering content and competition in particular were notable drawbacks of the community. Overall, recovery communities on unmoderated sites or social media applications may be useful tools during the recovery process, despite some important limitations.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Psychiatry and Mental health,Nutrition and Dietetics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3