Psychotherapies for eating disorders: findings from a rapid review

Author:

Russell Haley,Aouad Phillip,Le Anvi,Marks Peta,Maloney Danielle,Aouad Phillip,Barakat Sarah,Boakes Robert,Brennan Leah,Bryant Emma,Byrne Susan,Caldwell Belinda,Calvert Shannon,Carroll Bronny,Castle David,Caterson Ian,Chelius Belinda,Chiem Lyn,Clarke Simon,Conti Janet,Crouch Lexi,Dammery Genevieve,Dzajkovski Natasha,Fardouly Jasmine,Feneley John,Foroughi Nasim,Fuller-Tyszkiewicz Mathew,Fursland Anthea,Gonzalez-Arce Veronica,Gouldthorp Bethanie,Griffin Kelly,Griffiths Scott,Hambleton Ashlea,Hannigan Amy,Hart Mel,Hart Susan,Hay Phillipa,Hickie Ian,Kay-Lambkin Francis,King Ross,Kohn Michael,Koreshe Eyza,Krug Isabel,Linardon Jake,Long Randall,Long Amanda,Madden Sloane,Maguire Sarah,Maloney Danielle,Marks Peta,McLean Siân,Meddick Thy,Miskovic-Wheatley Jane,Mitchison Deborah,O’Kearney Richard,Ong Shu Hwa,Paterson Roger,Paxton Susan,Pehlivan Melissa,Pepin Genevieve,Phillipou Andrea,Piccone Judith,Pinkus Rebecca,Raykos Bronwyn,Rhodes Paul,Rieger Elizabeth,Rockett Karen,Rodan Sarah,Russell Janice,Russell Haley,Salter Fiona,Sawyer Susan,Shelton Beth,Singh Urvashnee,Smith Sophie,Smith Evelyn,Spielman Karen,Squire Sarah,Thomson Juliette,Tiggemann Marika,Touyz Stephen,Utpala Ranjani,Vartanian Lenny,Vatter Sabina,Wallis Andrew,Ward Warren,Wells Sarah,Wertheim Eleanor,Wilksch Simon,Williams Michelle,Touyz Stephen,Maguire Sarah,

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPsychotherapy is considered central to the effective treatment of eating disorders—focusing on behavioural, psychological, and social factors that contribute to the illness. Research indicates psychotherapeutic interventions out-perform placebo, waitlist, and/or other treatments; but, outcomes vary with room for major improvement. Thus, this review aims to (1) establish and consolidate knowledge on efficacious eating disorder psychotherapies; (2) highlight select emerging psychotherapeutic interventions; and (3) identify knowledge gaps to better inform future treatment research and development.MethodsThe current review forms part of a series of Rapid Reviews published in a special issue in the Journal of Eating Disorders to inform the development of the Australian-government-funded National Eating Disorder Research and Translation Strategy 2021–2031. Three databases were searched for studies published between 2009 and 2023, published in English, and comprising high-level evidence studies (meta-analyses, systematic reviews, moderately sized randomised controlled studies, moderately sized controlled-cohort studies, and population studies). Data pertaining to psychotherapies for eating disorders were synthesised and outlined in the current paper.Results281 studies met inclusion criteria. Behavioural therapies were most commonly studied, with cognitive-behavioural and family-based therapies being the most researched; and thus, having the largest evidence-base for treating anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder. Other therapies, such as interpersonal and dialectical behaviour therapies also demonstrated positive treatment outcomes. Emerging evidence supports specific use of Acceptance and Commitment; Integrative Cognitive Affective; Exposure; Mindfulness; and Emotionally-Focused therapies; however further research is needed to determine their efficacy. Similarly, growing support for self-help, group, and computer/internet-based therapeutic modalities was noted. Psychotherapies for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder; other, and unspecified feeding and eating disorders were lacking evidence.ConclusionsCurrently, clinical practice is largely supported by research indicating that behavioural and cognitive-behavioural psychotherapies are most effective for the treatment of eating disorders. However, the efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions varies across studies, highlighting the need for investment and expansion of research into enhanced variants and novel psychotherapies to improve illness outcomes. There is also a pressing need for investigation into the whole range of eating disorder presentations and populations, to determine the most effective interventions.

Funder

Department of Health, Australian Government, Australia

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Psychiatry and Mental health,Nutrition and Dietetics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3