Interferon-gamma producing CD4+ T cells quantified by flow cytometry as early markers for Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis infection in cattle
-
Published:2024-05-31
Issue:1
Volume:55
Page:
-
ISSN:1297-9716
-
Container-title:Veterinary Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Vet Res
Author:
Bulun Hakan, Bridger Philip S., Schillinger Simone, Akineden Ömer, Barth Stefanie A., Fischer Marta, Henrich Manfred, Seeger Torsten, Doll Klaus, Bülte Michael, Bauerfeind Rolf, Menge ChristianORCID
Abstract
AbstractCurrent diagnostic methods for Johne’s disease in cattle allow reliable detection of infections with Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis (MAP) not before animals are 2 years of age. Applying a flow cytometry-based approach (FCA) to quantify a MAP-specific interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) response in T cell subsets, the present study sought to monitor the kinetics of the cell-mediated immune response in experimentally infected calves. Six MAP-negative calves and six calves, orally inoculated with MAP at 10 days of age, were sampled every 4 weeks for 52 weeks post-inoculation (wpi). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were stimulated with either purified protein derivatives (PPD) or whole cell sonicates derived from MAP (WCSj), M. avium ssp. avium or M. phlei for 6 days followed by labeling of intracellular IFN-γ in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. No antigen-specific IFN-γ production was detectable in CD8+ cells throughout and the responses of CD4+ cells of MAP-infected and control calves were similar up to 12 wpi. However, the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) for the detection of IFN-γ in CD4+ cells after WCSj antigen stimulation allowed for a differentiation of animal groups from 16 wpi onwards. This approach had a superior sensitivity (87.8%) and specificity (86.8%) to detect infected animals from 16 wpi onwards, i.e., in an early infection stage, as compared to the IFN-γ release assay (IGRA). Quantification of specific IFN-γ production at the level of individual CD4+ cells may serve, therefore, as a valuable tool to identify MAP-infected juvenile cattle.
Funder
Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Bundesforschungsinstitut für Tiergesundheit
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference74 articles.
1. Whittington R, Donat K, Weber MF, Kelton D, Nielsen SS, Eisenberg S, Arrigoni N, Juste R, Saez JL, Dhand N, Santi A, Michel A, Barkema H, Kralik P, Kostoulas P, Citer L, Griffin F, Barwell R, Moreira MAS, Slana I, Koehler H, Singh SV, Yoo HS, Chavez-Gris G, Goodridge A, Ocepek M, Garrido J, Stevenson K, Collins M, Alonso B, et al. (2019) Control of paratuberculosis: who, why and how. a review of 48 countries. BMC Vet Res 15:198 2. Nielsen SS, Toft N (2008) Ante mortem diagnosis of paratuberculosis: a review of accuracies of ELISA, interferon-gamma assay and faecal culture techniques. Vet Microbiol 129:217–235 3. Barkema HW, Orsel K, Nielsen SS, Koets AP, Rutten V, Bannantine JP, Keefe GP, Kelton DF, Wells SJ, Whittington RJ, Mackintosh CG, Manning EJ, Weber MF, Heuer C, Forde TL, Ritter C, Roche S, Corbett CS, Wolf R, Griebel PJ, Kastelic JP, De Buck J (2018) Knowledge gaps that hamper prevention and control of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infection. Transbound Emerg Dis 65:125–148 4. Cocito C, Gilot P, Coene M, de Kesel M, Poupart P, Vannuffel P (1994) Paratuberculosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 7:328–345 5. Stabel JR, Whitlock RH (2001) An evaluation of a modified interferon-gamma assay for the detection of paratuberculosis in dairy herds. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 79:69–81
|
|